A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. | LitMetric

Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods.

J Cataract Refract Surg

From the Ein-Tal Eye Center (Abulafia, Rotenberg, Kleinmann, Levy, Reitblat, Assia), Tel-Aviv, the Meir Medical Center (Assia), Kfar-Saba, the Tel-Aviv University (Abulafia, Assia), Ramat Aviv, and the Kaplan Medical Center (Rotenberg, Kleinmann), Rehovot, Israel; the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (Abulafia, Barrett), Nedlands, Australia; the Cullen Eye Institute (Koch, Wang), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Published: March 2015

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of formulas and methods for calculating the intraocular lens (IOL) power for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.0 mm.

Setting: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: The postoperative refraction results in myopic eyes with an AL over 26.0 mm were compared with the predicted refractions calculated using standard formulas (Holladay 1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) with optical IOL constants, User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants, and an AL-adjustment method and using new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, and Olsen).

Results: In 76 (71.7%) of 106 eyes, the IOL was 6.0 diopters (D) or more (Group A) and in 30 eyes (28.3%) was less than 6.0 D (Group B). In Group A, the SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, and Olsen methods met the benchmark criteria of having a prediction error of ±0.5 D in at least 71.0% of eyes and ±1.0 D in 93.0% of eyes. In Group B, only the Barrett Universal II formula and the Holladay 1 and Haigis formulas using the AL-adjusted method met those criteria.

Conclusion: When selecting IOLs for high and extreme myopia, choosing appropriate formulas and methods can yield accurate refractive results that meet benchmark criteria.

Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

formulas methods
12
barrett universal
12
intraocular lens
8
eyes axial
8
axial length
8
length greater
8
greater 260
8
srk/t hoffer
8
hoffer haigis
8
universal holladay
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!