Effectiveness of a clinical protocol implemented to standardize snakebite management in Iran: initial evaluation.

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new protocol implemented to standardize snakebite management in Iran.

Methods: In this study, 27 patients treated according to the new protocol in 2012 (P+) were compared with 22 patients treated according to the previous modality in the year before implementation of the protocol (P-) in Mashhad Medical Toxicology Centre (MTC). Demographic characteristics and treatment details of all patients were recorded prospectively. Envenomation severity of each victim was assessed according to snakebite severity score (SSS).

Results: After implementation of the protocol, a smaller percentage of patients received antivenom (AV) therapy (78% vs 95%; P=.079). In spite of no significant difference in baseline severity of envenomation between the 2 groups (SSS [mean±SD], 34.8±18.1 vs 35.5±17.4; P=.801), the P+ group received significantly fewer AV vials (8.4±6.8 vs 12.1±5.6 vials; P=.042) and had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (2.2±1.5 vs 3.2±1.8 days; P=.027). Moreover, smaller proportion of P+ patients experienced recurrence of venom-induced effects; however, the difference was not significant (18.5% vs 36%; P=.159). The reduction in use of antiallergy treatments to prevent or treat acute hypersensitivity reactions approached statistical significance (41% vs 68%; P=.051). These findings denote a reduction in AV use of approximately 4 vials and a reduction in hospital stay of 1 day for each patient, which translates to approximately $196/patient in healthcare cost savings.

Conclusions: Implementation of a snakebite management protocol at MTC reduced overall antivenom usage, use of antiallergy interventions, and length of hospital stay.