A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A pharmacodynamic evaluation of dexmedetomidine as an additive drug to ropivacaine for peripheral nerve blockade: A randomised, triple-blind, controlled study in volunteers. | LitMetric

A pharmacodynamic evaluation of dexmedetomidine as an additive drug to ropivacaine for peripheral nerve blockade: A randomised, triple-blind, controlled study in volunteers.

Eur J Anaesthesiol

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy (MK, PM, SCK, DM, OK), and Department of Clinical Pharmacology (MK, MZ), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Published: November 2015

Background: Previous data have indicated the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an additive to peripheral regional anaesthesia. There are no pharmacodynamic data regarding the addition of dexmedetomidine to local anaesthetics for perineural administration.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the dose-dependency of dexmedetomidine when injected with ropivacaine for peripheral nerve blockade.

Design: A randomised, triple-blind, controlled study in volunteers.

Setting: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna.

Participants: Twenty-four volunteers.

Interventions: All volunteers received an ulnar nerve block with 22.5 mg ropivacaine alone (R), or mixed with 50 (RD50), 100 (RD100) or 150 μg (RD150) dexmedetomidine.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the duration of complete sensory block to pinprick and time to complete recovery of pinprick. Secondary outcomes included block success and onset time, motor block, haemodynamic parameters and sedation level.

Results: There was a significant dose-dependent (P < 0.0001) increase in the mean duration (SD) of sensory block with dexmedetomidine: R: 8.7 (1.5) h, RD50: 16.4 (4.0) h, RD100: 20.4 (2.8) h and group RD150: 21.2 (1.7) h. Sedation was also enhanced in a dose-dependent (P < 0.001) manner. Two volunteers each receiving 150 μg dexmedetomidine had postblock paraesthesia for 72 h.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine mixed with ropivacaine produces a dose-dependent prolongation of sensory block and clinically relevant dose-dependent sedation. Dexmedetomidine 100 μg may represent a balance between efficacy and sedation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000246DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dexmedetomidine additive
8
ropivacaine peripheral
8
peripheral nerve
8
randomised triple-blind
8
triple-blind controlled
8
controlled study
8
pharmacodynamic evaluation
4
dexmedetomidine
4
evaluation dexmedetomidine
4
additive drug
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!