Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and time course of asynchronies during mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods: Prospective, noninterventional observational study of 50 patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) beds equipped with Better Care™ software throughout MV. The software distinguished ventilatory modes and detected ineffective inspiratory efforts during expiration (IEE), double-triggering, aborted inspirations, and short and prolonged cycling to compute the asynchrony index (AI) for each hour. We analyzed 7,027 h of MV comprising 8,731,981 breaths.

Results: Asynchronies were detected in all patients and in all ventilator modes. The median AI was 3.41 % [IQR 1.95-5.77]; the most common asynchrony overall and in each mode was IEE [2.38 % (IQR 1.36-3.61)]. Asynchronies were less frequent from 12 pm to 6 am [1.69 % (IQR 0.47-4.78)]. In the hours where more than 90 % of breaths were machine-triggered, the median AI decreased, but asynchronies were still present. When we compared patients with AI > 10 vs AI ≤ 10 %, we found similar reintubation and tracheostomy rates but higher ICU and hospital mortality and a trend toward longer duration of MV in patients with an AI above the cutoff.

Conclusions: Asynchronies are common throughout MV, occurring in all MV modes, and more frequently during the daytime. Further studies should determine whether asynchronies are a marker for or a cause of mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3692-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asynchronies mechanical
8
mechanical ventilation
8
asynchronies
7
ventilation associated
4
associated mortality
4
mortality purpose
4
purpose study
4
study aimed
4
aimed assess
4
assess prevalence
4

Similar Publications

Optimizing Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical and Practical Bedside Method for the Identification and Management of Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies in Critical Care.

J Clin Med

January 2025

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental (ULSLO), Estrada Forte do Alto Duque, 1449-005 Lisbon, Portugal.

The prompt identification and correction of patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) remain a cornerstone for ensuring the quality of respiratory failure treatment and the prevention of further injury to critically ill patients. These disruptions, whether due to over- or under-assistance, have a profound clinical impact not only on the respiratory mechanics and the mortality associated with mechanical ventilation but also on the patient's cardiac output and hemodynamic profile. Strong evidence has demonstrated that these frequently occurring and often underdiagnosed events have significant prognostic value for mechanical ventilation outcomes and are strongly associated with prolonged ICU stays and hospital mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the most frequently used organ replacement modalities in the intensive care unit (ICU). Artificial intelligence (AI) presents substantial potential in optimizing mechanical ventilation management. The utility of AI in MV lies in its ability to harness extensive data from electronic monitoring systems, facilitating personalized care tailored to individual patient needs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Reverse triggering (RT) is a ventilatory asynchrony characterized by the activation of respiratory muscles in response to passive mechanical insufflation. Although RT can potentially exacerbate lung injury, its characteristics in patients with acute brain injury remain under-explored. This study aims to elucidate the incidence and factors associated with RT in this patient population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients.

Curr Opin Crit Care

February 2025

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Article Synopsis
  • Recent studies indicate that spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation in ARDS can damage the lungs due to factors like high transpulmonary pressure and patient-ventilator mismatch.
  • Neuromuscular blockers are effective in reducing this risk, but they come with a downside of possible muscle atrophy.
  • Alternative strategies such as partial paralysis, sedatives, higher PEEP, and prone positioning could help lessen lung injury while preserving muscle function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!