Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documents are medical orders intended to honor patient choice in the hospital and prehospital settings. We hypothesized that prehospital personnel will find these forms confusing.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether POLST documents accord consensus in determining code status and treatment decisions among emergency medical services providers on the basis of an Internet survey. Consensus in this context reflects content clarity.
Methods: A statewide survey of Pennsylvania emergency medical technicians and paramedics was conducted from October 2013 to January 2014. Respondents supplied code status and treatment decisions for scenarios involving critically ill patients who present with POLST documents and then develop cardiac arrest. The gamut of combinations of resuscitations (do not resuscitate [DNR], cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and treatment (full, limited, comfort measures) was represented. Subgroup analysis was done using the Fisher exact test with a Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.017 as significant. We defined consensus as a supermajority of 95%.
Results: Response to the survey was 18.4% (1069/5800). For scenarios specifying DNR and full or limited treatment, most chose DNR (59%-84%) and 25% to 75% chose resuscitation. With DNR and comfort measures specified, approximately 85% selected DNR and withheld resuscitation. When cardiopulmonary resuscitation/full treatment was presented, 95% selected "full code" and resuscitation. Respondent age significantly affected response rates (P ≤ 0.004); prior POLST education had no impact. For most scenarios, responses failed to attain consensus, suggesting confusion in interpretation of the form.
Conclusions: In the Pennsylvania prehospital setting, POLST documents can be confusing, presenting a risk to patient safety. Additional research, standardized education, training, and/or safeguards are required to facilitate patient choice and protect safety.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000164 | DOI Listing |
Healthcare (Basel)
October 2024
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.
Ann Vasc Surg
January 2025
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address:
J Palliat Med
August 2024
Supportive Care Services, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Concordance between physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) preferences and treatment at end-of-life is an important outcome measure of providing patient-centered care. We determine whether the COVID pandemic affected clinician ability to provide goal concordant care and replicate our previous report on care concordance and change in patient preferences over time with a larger sample size. We also investigate the quality of POLST completion to determine the number of documents completed with an advance care planning (ACP) conversation or a decision maker present.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
July 2024
Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, 4 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Comprehensive resuscitation plans document treatment recommendations, such as 'Not for cardiopulmonary resuscitation'. When created early in admission as a shared decision-making process, these plans support patient autonomy and guide future treatment. The characteristics of patients who have resuscitation plans documented, their timing, and associations with clinical outcomes remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Med Dir Assoc
April 2024
School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Signature Center, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Objectives: POLST is widely used in the care of seriously ill patients to document decisions made during advance care planning (ACP) conversations as actionable medical orders. We conducted an integrative review of existing research to better understand associations between POLST use and key ACP outcomes as well as to identify directions for future research.
Design: Integrative review.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!