Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA.

Ambio

USDA-ARS, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, TX, 76502-6712, USA,

Published: March 2015

Conservation practices are implemented on farm fields in the USA through Farm Bill programs; however, there is a need for greater verification that these practices provide environmental benefits (e.g., water quality). This study was conducted to assess the impact of Farm Bill eligible conservation practices on soluble P (SP) and total P (TP) losses from four fields that were monitored between 2004 and 2013. No-tillage doubled SP loading compared to rotational tillage (e.g., tilled only before planting corn); however, no-tillage decreased TP loading by 69 % compared to rotational tillage. Similarly, grassed waterways were shown to increase SP loads, but not TP loads. A corn-soybean-wheat-oat rotation reduced SP loads by 85 % and TP loads by 83 % compared to the standard corn-soybean rotation in the region. We can potentially attain TP water quality goals using these Farm Bill practices; however, additional strategies must be employed to meet these goals for SP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329148PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0624-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conservation practices
12
farm bill
12
water quality
8
loading compared
8
compared rotational
8
rotational tillage
8
loads loads
8
practices
5
phosphorus losses
4
losses monitored
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!