Approaches to answering critical CER questions.

Cancer Treat Res

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Published: April 2015

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for research, many research questions cannot be ethically and practically answered using an RCT. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) techniques are often better suited than RCTs to address the effects of an intervention under routine care conditions, an outcome otherwise known as effectiveness. CER research techniques covered in this section include: effectiveness-oriented experimental studies such as pragmatic trials and cluster randomized trials, treatment response heterogeneity, observational and database studies including adjustment techniques such as sensitivity analysis and propensity score analysis, systematic reviews and meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. Each section describes the technique and covers the strengths and weaknesses of the approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

effectiveness cer
8
cer techniques
8
approaches answering
4
answering critical
4
critical cer
4
cer questions
4
questions randomized
4
randomized controlled
4
controlled trials
4
trials rcts
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!