Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We report 3 cases of the extremely rare lipomatous variant of angiomyofibroblastoma (AMF) involving the vulva of women aged 35, 45, and 47. The lesions ranged in size from 2.5 to 12 cm in maximum dimension and the largest had a gross "fatty" appearance. The percentage of adipose tissue was approximately 50% in 1 case and over 90% in the other 2. In all the cases, there was a background of typical AMF with bland spindled and epithelioid cells arranged around blood vessels, although in the cases with >90% adipose tissue, this was subtle and diffusely interspersed with the adipose tissue. In all the cases, the spindled and epithelioid cells were positive with estrogen receptor. Given the morphologic features, misdiagnosis as a lipomatous neoplasm is likely, especially in cases with a minor component of typical AMF. We review the literature on lipomatous AMF and discuss the differential diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000131 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!