Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The effect of silicon nanowire (Si NW) diameter on the functionalization efficiency as given by covalent Si-C bond formation is studied for two distinct examples of 25 ± 5 and 50 ± 5 nm diameters (Si NW25 and Si NW50, respectively). A two-step chlorination/alkylation process is used to connect alkyl chains of various lengths (C1-C18) to thinner and thicker Si NWs. The shorter the alkyl chain lengths, the larger the surface coverage of the two studied Si NWs. Increasing the alkyl chain length (C2-C9) changes the coverage on the NWs: while for Si NW25 90 ± 10% of all surface sites are covered with Si-C bonds, only 50 ± 10% of all surface sites are covered with Si-C bonds for the Si NW50 wires. Increasing the chain length further to C14-C18 decreases the alkyl coverage to 36 ± 6% in thin Si NW25 and to 20 ± 5% in thick Si NW50. These findings can be interpreted as being a result of increased steric hindrance of Si-C bond formation for longer chain lengths and higher surface energy for the thinner Si NWs. As a direct consequence of these findings, Si NW surfaces have different stabilities against oxidation: they are more stable at higher Si-C bond coverage, and the surface stability was found to be dependent on the Si-C binding energy itself. The Si-C binding energy differs according to (C1-9)-Si NW > (C14-18)-Si NW, i.e., the shorter the alkyl chain, the greater the Si-C binding energy. However, the oxidation resistance of the (C2-18)-Si NW25 is lower than for equivalent Si NW50 surfaces as explained and experimentally substantiated based on electronic (XPS and KP) and structure (TEM and HAADF) measurements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la5047244 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!