Somatostatin Receptors in Lung Cancer: From Function to Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics.

J Lung Cancer

Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee, USA ; Tennessee Valley VA Healthcare System, Tennessee, USA ; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Published: January 2011

Lung cancer is a deadly disease that is difficult to diagnose and even more difficult to treat effectively. Many pathways are known to affect tumor growth, and targeting these pathways provides the cornerstone by which cancer is treated. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are a family of G protein coupled receptors that signal to alter hormonal secretion, increase apoptosis, and decrease cellular proliferation. These receptors are expressed in many normal and malignant cells, including both small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Synthetic analogs of SSTRs are commercially available, but their effects in lung cancer are still largely uncertain. Signaling pathway studies have shown that SSTRs signal through phosphotyrosine phosphatases to induce apoptosis as well as to decrease cell proliferation. Radiolabeled SSTR2 analogs are utilized for radiographic imaging of tumors, which, when combined with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) may improve detection of lung cancer. These radiolabeled SSTR2 analogs also hold promise for targeted chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy. In this review, we summarize what is known about SSTRs and focus our discussion on the knowledge as it relates to lung cancer biology, as well as discuss current and future uses of these receptors for imaging and therapy of lung cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319675PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.6058/jlc.2011.10.2.69DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
28
somatostatin receptors
8
cancer
8
radiolabeled sstr2
8
sstr2 analogs
8
lung
7
receptors lung
4
cancer function
4
function molecular
4
molecular imaging
4

Similar Publications

Feasibility of detecting non-small cell lung cancer using exhaled breath condensate metabolomics.

J Breath Res

January 2025

School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, CHINA.

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancy in the world, and early detection of lung cancer remains a challenge. The exhaled breath condensate (EBC) from lung and trachea can be collected totally noninvasively. In this study, our aim is to identify differential metabolites between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and control EBC samples and discriminate NSCLC group from control group by orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Substantial epidemiological evidence suggests a significant correlation between particulate matter 2.5 (PM) and lung cancer. However, the mechanism underlying this association needs to be further elucidated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A previous study classifies solid tumors based on collagen deposition and immune infiltration abundance, identifying a refractory subtype termed armored & cold tumors, characterized by elevated collagen deposition and diminished immune infiltration. Beyond its impact on immune infiltration, collagen deposition also influences tumor angiogenesis. This study systematically analyzes the association between immuno-collagenic subtypes and angiogenesis across diverse cancer types.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breath analysis is increasingly recognized as a powerful noninvasive diagnostic technique, and a plethora of exhaled volatile biomarkers have been associated with various diseases. However, traditional analytical methodologies are not amenable to high-throughput diagnostic applications at the point of need. An optical spectroscopic technique, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), mostly used in the research setting for liquid sample analysis, has recently been applied to breath-based diagnostics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The increasing shift from cannabis smoking to cannabis vaping is largely driven by the perception that vaping to form an aerosol represents a safer alternative to smoking and is a form of consumption appealing to youth. Herein, we compared the chemical composition and receptor-mediated activity of cannabis smoke extract (CaSE) to cannabis vaping extract (CaVE) along with the biological response in human bronchial epithelial cells. Chemical analysis using HPLC and GC/MS revealed that cannabis vaping aerosol contained fewer toxicants than smoke; CaSE and CaVE contained teratogens, carcinogens, and respiratory toxicants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!