Comparison of operant escape and reflex tests of nociceptive sensitivity.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev

Department of Orthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

Published: April 2015

Testing of reflexes such as flexion/withdrawal or licking/guarding is well established as the standard for evaluating nociceptive sensitivity and its modulation in preclinical investigations of laboratory animals. Concerns about this approach have been dismissed for practical reasons - reflex testing requires no training of the animals; it is simple to instrument; and responses are characterized by observers as latencies or thresholds for evocation. In order to evaluate this method, the present review summarizes a series of experiments in which reflex and operant escape responding are compared in normal animals and following surgical models of neuropathic pain or pharmacological intervention for pain. Particular attention is paid to relationships between reflex and escape responding and information on the pain sensitivity of normal human subjects or patients with pain. Numerous disparities between results for reflex and operant escape measures are described, but the results of operant testing are consistent with evidence from humans. Objective reasons are given for experimenters to choose between these and other methods of evaluating the nociceptive sensitivity of laboratory animals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

operant escape
12
nociceptive sensitivity
12
evaluating nociceptive
8
laboratory animals
8
reflex operant
8
escape responding
8
reflex
5
comparison operant
4
escape
4
escape reflex
4

Similar Publications

Exploring persistence in animal models: The sinking platform test.

J Neurosci Methods

December 2024

Dept. of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address:

Persistence is the capacity to sustain goal-oriented behavior despite recurring obstacles and setbacks. Recent studies have underscored the importance of this attribute as an integral facet of resilience and a protective factor against depression. In animal models, persistence is commonly examined through operant paradigms, wherein it is operationalized as resistance to the extinction of reward-directed actions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness consisting of obsessions and compulsions. OCD severity and treatment response are correlated with avoidant behaviors thought be performed to alleviate obsession-related anxiety. However, little is known about either the role of avoidance in the development of OCD or the interplay between anxiety states and avoidance behaviors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Exercise intensity in horses is self-regulated, influenced by factors like social behaviors and operant conditioning, and may increase when another horse is seen ahead.
  • In an experiment with seven horses, displaying a video of a trotting horse led to higher heart rates, plasma lactate levels, and specific behavioral changes compared to a control image without horses.
  • The findings suggest that visual stimuli can motivate horses to exercise more intensely, indicating the ability of horses to adapt to social cues without the need for harsh training methods like using a whip.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) has long been associated with the promotion of motivated behavior. However, inhibited dopamine signaling can increase behavior in certain settings, such as during drug self-administration. While aversive environmental stimuli can reduce dopamine, it is unclear whether such stimuli reliably engage this mechanism in different contexts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Substance use disorders are defined by persistent drug consumption despite adverse consequences. Accordingly, we developed two fentanyl-vs-shock avoidance/escape choice procedures in which male and female rats responded under a fixed-ratio (FR)1:FR1 concurrent schedule of shock avoidance/escape and IV fentanyl under either mutually exclusive or non-exclusive choice conditions. Initial experiments using a discrete-trial procedure determined behavioral allocation between mutually exclusive shock avoidance/escape and different fentanyl doses (0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!