A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study of the effect of a customized wheelchair cushion on clinical variables, satisfaction, and functionality among patients with spinal cord injury.

Ostomy Wound Manage

Universidad Iberoamericana (UIA), Mexico City, Mexico; and Escuela de Ingeniería, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM), Campus Santa Fe, Mexico City, Mexico.

Published: February 2015

The Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación (Rehabilitation National Institute) (INR) developed a prototype wheelchair cushion (INR cushion) designed to adjust to the anthropometry of the user's ischiogluteal area and prevent pressure ulcer formation while maintaining or promoting functionality. A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study was conducted from February 2010 to February 2011 to evaluate the effect of using the INR cushion on clinical variables, functionality, and user satisfaction. Sixteen patients were recruited (9 male, 7 female, average age 31.8 [range 22-47] years, average body mass index 25 [range 22-34], average time in a wheelchair 10.1 [range 3-26] years) who met the study protocol inclusion criteria of being pressure ulcer-free for at least 6 months and capable of propulsion and transfer without assistance, chronic spinal cord injury (>2 years), and without chronic-degenerative diseases or cognitive problems. Each participant received the cushion for a 2-month evaluation. Eight clinical variables were assessed: trunk control, posture, spasticity, transfer capacity, comfort, skin reaction, propulsion capacity, and pressure release capacity. The clinical assessment was performed using validated scales and instruments: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Functional Independence Measure™ (FIM), Norton Scale, and assessment of skin reaction. Interface pressures were measured using force sensing array, and participants completed a structured interview to assess user expectation, perceived functionality, perceived quality, and likelihood of recommending the device. Two patients withdrew due to appointment conflicts; of the remaining 14, significant differences between the user's experience with other products and the INR were found with regard to pressure redistribution (P = 0.012); all participants but 1 graded the INR as good in all interview categories. No participants developed a pressure ulcer during the study. The customized cushion was especially functional among patients with incomplete thoracic and cervical injuries, high FIM scores, and moderate levels of activities of daily living. Taller patients (P = 0.01) and patients with higher degrees of spasticity (P = 0.007) were less satisfied with functionality. The results of this study contributed to the redesign process of the cushion. These findings may be useful to establish predictors, both subjective and clinical, for patient utilization of wheelchair cushion use.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wheelchair cushion
12
clinical variables
12
prospective longitudinal
8
longitudinal descriptive
8
descriptive study
8
study customized
8
cushion
8
cushion clinical
8
spinal cord
8
cord injury
8

Similar Publications

Reliability of cushion construction for a low-cost pressure-reducing wheelchair cushion for less-resourced settings.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol

December 2024

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

In less-resourced settings, 80% of people with spinal cord injuries die from pressure ulcer complications within two years. Appropriately constructed wheelchair cushions are effective in reducing incidence and severity of pressure ulcers. The Tuball is an inexpensive wheelchair cushion designed for users in less-resourced settings, which can be reproduced by local clinicians using locally sourced materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sitting pressure during wheelchair propulsion and handcycling: effects of backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol

November 2024

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The main aim of this study was to compare sitting pressure (peak pressure index (PPI) and peak pressure gradient (PPG)) between a daily wheelchair and fixed-frame handcycle, thereby assessing the effect of handcycle backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type. Twenty able-bodied participants performed static and dynamic (two intensities) tests in a wheelchair and handcycle. A honeycomb wheelchair cushion and standard foam handcycle cushion were used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study combines laboratory testing with computer modelling to demonstrate, for the first time, the applicability of flexible-spoke non-pneumatic tyre (FS-NPT) technology in wheelchairs. Like existing solid non-pneumatic tyres, FS-NPTs are puncture-proof and will reduce the burden of tyre maintenance. Unlike existing solid tyres, FS-NPT performance is based on the properties of flexible structures (spokes), such as honeycombs, which can deform to offer superior cushioning and return to their original shape upon unloading.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study, we aimed to examine whether a wheelchair cushion placed directly atop a sling seat or deflection of the sling seat compensated by a pad along with the placement of a wheelchair cushion changed sitting pressure. Additionally, we examined whether these additions changed sitting comfort. For twenty healthy adults who consented to participate, measurements were taken for three types of cushions, each with and without padding, under six conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of the wheelchair sitting posture on gluteal pressure.

J Phys Ther Sci

September 2024

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma University of Health and Welfare: 2-12-1 Honmachi, Maebashi-shi, Gunma 371-0023, Japan.

[Purpose] To evaluate the efficacy of the "forward-tilting posture" (the trunk tilted forward against a table) in a wheelchair in relieving gluteal pressure. [Participants and Methods] Thirty-six healthy adults were instructed to sit in a wheelchair assuming the following three postures: (1) both feet placed on the foot support with the trunk upright ("basic sitting posture"), (2) both feet placed on the foot support with the trunk tilted forward against a table ("forward-tilting posture A"), and (3) both feet placed on the floor with the trunk tilted forward against a table ("forward-tilting posture B"). A seat-type sensor pad placed on a wheelchair cushion was used to measure the maximum gluteal pressure and gluteal contact area.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!