AI Article Synopsis

  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment for small renal tumors, but its use is limited by the proximity of tumors to critical structures like the renal pelvis and ureter. This study explores retrograde pyeloperfusion (PPF) with varying temperatures of saline to protect these areas during RFA.
  • The ex vivo model showed that using cold or warm saline during PPF significantly reduced temperatures around the treatment area compared to no PPF, with warm saline yielding the highest ablation volumes.
  • Results suggest that PPF not only decreases temperatures in the kidney but also minimizes tissue charring, indicating that the temperature of the saline used plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of RFA.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective technique for the treatment of patients with small renal tumors, although it is often limited to tumors at least 2 cm from the renal pelvis or ureter. Retrograde pyeloperfusion (PPF) of the pelvis with cold saline during RFA may protect the pelvis and ureter. We designed a mathematical and ex vivo model of RFA to investigate the effects of PPF.

Methods: Our theoretical model uses heat transfer principles simplifying the RFA probe to a heat-emitting cylinder within a material. In the ex vivo model, an RFA probe was placed 18 mm from the pelvis in porcine kidneys and with temperature probes on either side of the RFA probe. Control trials with no PPF were compared with either cold saline (2°C), warm saline (38°C), or antifreeze (-20°C) pumped into the renal calix at a rate of 60 mL/min. Ablated volumes were measured and confirmed histologically.

Results: The average steady state temperatures at each probe were highest with no PPF, followed by warm saline, cold saline, then antifreeze. Compared with no PPF, temperatures were significantly (P<0.05) colder with warm saline (-8.4°C), cold saline (-18°C), and significantly colder at the calix (warm -14°C, cold -27°C). While RFA output a constant voltage, significantly lower resistances in warm (171Ω) and cold (124Ω) PPF vs no PPF (363Ω) translated to significantly greater power outputs in warm (40 W) and cold (42 W) vs no PPF (14 W). The ablated volumes were significantly higher in warm saline (2.3 cm(3)) vs cold saline (0.84 cm(3)) and no PPF (1.1 cm(3)). Mathematical modeling produced a predictive temperature curve with R2=0.44.

Conclusion: PPF lowers temperatures throughout the entire kidney during RFA, most notably near the collecting system and is dependent on the temperature of the liquid used. In addition, PPF may cause less charring of the tissue around the probe resulting in lower resistance and higher power outputs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0702DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cold saline
12
rfa probe
12
mathematical vivo
8
radiofrequency ablation
8
pelvis ureter
8
vivo model
8
model rfa
8
warm saline
8
rfa
6
saline
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!