Reliability and validity of 6 measures of pain, function, and disability for ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis.

Foot Ankle Int

Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Published: June 2015

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used evaluating clinical care. Many measures used to assess operative hindfoot interventions vary in content, and some have not been psychometrically validated in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare measurement properties of 6 lower-extremity patient-reported outcome measures, and to evaluate their reliability and validity in light of patients' preferences.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 42 preoperative and 100 postoperative patients completed 6 lower-extremity outcome measures on 2 occasions: Foot Function Index (FFI), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), patient-reported items of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Questionnaire (AOFAS), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), as well as measures of preference, and symptoms.

Results: Internal consistency was good to excellent for all scales and subscales (α = .84-.97; ICC [2,1] = .81-.96). Correlations between scales ranged from .50 (WOMAC(Stiffness) and FFI(Activity) Limitations) to .92 (LEFS and SMFA(Overall), WOMAC(Pain) and AOS(Overall), FFI(Overall) and AOFAS(Overall)). Higher correlations occurred within instruments (r = .97 AOS(Pain) and AOS(Overall)) and between similar subscales from different instruments (r = .91 WOMAC(Pain) and AOS(Pain)). Construct validity showed moderate to high correlations to global ratings of Pain, Stiffness, and difficulty performing Daily Activities. The highest correlations (r > .75) occurred between Pain and AOS(Overall) (r = .84), stiffness and WOMAC(Stiffness) (r = .81), and Daily Activities and AOS(Disability) (r = .87). Patients rated instruments by preference. FFI, WOMAC, LEFS, and SMFA rated favorably for length. FFI, WOMAC, LEFS, and AOFAS rated high for understandability. FFI was rated by postoperative patients as most likely to capture change due to surgery. SMFA rated the best overall.

Conclusions: Direct comparison of instruments revealed similarity between scales in construct validity and reliability. Patient preferences supported the use of these scales. Foot-specific instruments offered no clear advantage over lower-extremity instruments.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100714566624DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcome measures
12
reliability validity
8
patient-reported outcome
8
postoperative patients
8
correlations occurred
8
construct validity
8
daily activities
8
ffi womac
8
womac lefs
8
smfa rated
8

Similar Publications

The 2024 APLAR Consensus on the Management of Lupus Nephritis.

Int J Rheum Dis

January 2025

The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

The APLAR has published a set of recommendations on the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2021. The current consensus paper supplements and updates specifically the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) according to two rounds of Delphi exercise from members of the APLAR SLE special interest group, invited nephrologists, histopathologists, and lupus nephritis patients. For initial treatment of LN, we recommend a combination of glucocorticoids (GCs) with cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) as first-line options.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ESAIC focused guidelines for the management of the failing epidural during labour epidural analgesia.

Eur J Anaesthesiol

February 2025

From the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle de O'Donnell, 48, 28009 Madrid, Madrid, Spain (NB), the Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario Sanitas La Zarzuela, Madrid, c/ Pleyades, 25, 28023 Madrid, Spain (NB), the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, P° de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain (IVG), the Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesiology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (AA, KL), the University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Würzburg, Germany (PK, SR), the Division of Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Israel (CFW), the London North West NHS University Trust, Watford Road, London, UK HA1 3UJ (NL), the Department of Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, Liège University Hospital, Belgium (PYD), the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Av. de los Reyes Católicos, 2. 28040 Madrid. Spain (EGA), the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Shmuel Beyth St 12, Jerusalem, 9103102 Israel (AI), the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Sjukhusvägen, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden (AK), the Department of Anesthesia, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikvah, Israel affiliated with Tel Aviv University Medical School (SOZ), the Department of Anaesthesiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (OvdB), the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Belgium (MvdV), the Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital of Valencia, Methodology Department, European University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain (CSR).

Background: Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.

Design: Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this quasi-experimental before-after trial, we investigated the effects of a high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training (HI-LRMT) protocol on respiratory muscle strength in instrumental musicians. In addition, was to estimate the prevalence of "non-responders" (NRs) in terms of muscle force after intervention. Healthy musicians ( = 48) were divided into 2 groups: HI-LRMT ( = 33) and a control group that did not train (CG, = 15).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare the immediate effect of contrast compression therapy with the use of Game Ready (GRT) on hyperaemic reactions in the upper limb on the application and contralateral sides, specifically in the context of mixed martial arts (MMA) athletes.

Design: In this experimental, single-blind, randomized crossover study, we recruited 30 male volunteers training in MMA (mean age: 28.33 ± 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) patients with incomplete remission and drug dependence after long-term use of calmodulin inhibitors (CNIs). It aims for complete clinical and immunological remission, and cessation of CNI dependence.

Methods: Thirty-six patients were enrolled in the study with two groups: drug-dependent and partial remission or immune non-remission group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!