Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To evaluate the changes in corneal sensitivity after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with the epithelium off (epi-off) and with the epithelium on (epi-on) in eyes with keratoconus.
Design: Prospective interventional case series.
Setting: Eye Clinic, A. Fiorini Hospital, Terracina (Latina), Rome, Italy.
Methods: On the basis of the corneal pachymetry at the area of topographic steepening, eyes treated with CXL were divided in 2 groups: those with a corneal thickness of 400 μm or more (epi-off) and those with a corneal thickness of less than 400 μm (epi-on). Corneal sensitivity was measured using a contact esthesiometer (Cochet-Bonnet) before treatment and 1 and 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment.
Results: The study evaluated 50 CXL-treated eyes in 50 patients (25 epi-on and 25 epi-off) from January 7, 2012, to December 15, 2012. In the epi-off group, corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly reduced for up to 3 months after CXL and gradually returned to normal levels. In the epi-on group, corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly reduced for up to 7 days but was not statistically significantly different from preoperative values at other measurement times. At 7 days, the corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly lower in the epi-off eyes than in the epi-on eyes.
Conclusions: Epi-off and epi-on CXL both caused hypoesthesia, but corneal sensitivity subsequently recovered completely. The corneal hypoesthesia was more pronounced in eyes in which the epi-off technique was used, and the recovery time was shorter for eyes treated using epi-on CXL.
Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.030 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!