nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial.

J Natl Cancer Inst

Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia (DG); Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada (RHEM); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (PH); Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany (VH); Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (VK); Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (JS); Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria (WS); Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy (SS); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (JT); Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France (LT); Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata and University of Verona, Verona, Italy (GT); Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium (JLVL); Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia (RY); Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ (DNP); Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ (BL); Celgene Corporation, Boudry, Switzerland (AR); Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center at Scottsdale Healthcare/TGen, Scottsdale, AZ (DDVH).

Published: February 2015

Background: Positive findings from the phase III MPACT trial led to the regulatory approval of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. This report is an update of overall survival (OS) based on longer follow-up.

Methods: Patients (n = 861) with metastatic pancreatic cancer and a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or greater were randomly assigned one to one to receive nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. Efficacy data for this post hoc analysis were collected through May 9, 2013. Exploratory analyses of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were conducted. The primary efficacy endpoint was OS, which was analyzed for all randomly assigned patients by the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: The median OS was statistically significantly longer for nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone (8.7 vs 6.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62 to 0.83, P < .001). Long-term (>three-year) survivors were identified in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine arm only (4%). In pooled treatment arm analyses, higher CA19-9 level and NLR at baseline were statistically significantly associated with worse OS. There appeared to be a treatment effect for OS favoring nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine over gemcitabine alone in poor-prognosis subgroups defined by these factors (HR = 0.612, P < .001 for CA19-9 level ≥ median and HR = 0.81, P = .079 for NLR > 5).

Conclusions: These data confirm and extend the primary report of OS, supporting the superior efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine over gemcitabine alone. Subgroup analyses support the relevance of CA 19-9 and NLR as prognostic markers in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju413DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nab-paclitaxel gemcitabine
28
metastatic pancreatic
16
pancreatic cancer
16
gemcitabine gemcitabine
16
gemcitabine
10
phase iii
8
randomly assigned
8
ca19-9 level
8
nab-paclitaxel
7
metastatic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!