Medical reconciliation of dietary supplements: don't ask, don't tell.

Patient Educ Couns

Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.

Published: April 2015

Objective: To explore inpatient reconciliation of dietary supplement (DS) use and determine characteristics associated with DS documentation.

Methods: We analyzed DS use among 558 inpatients recruited from the Re-Engineered Discharge clinical trial to identify: (1) if patients self-reported DS and (2) if DS use was documented at admission. We examined socio-demographics for association with documentation using chi squares and t-tests. Logistic regression was performed to assess adjusted associations with DS documentation.

Results: Sixty percent reported DS use (n=333). Among users, 36% had admission DS documentation, 20% were asked about use at admission, 18% reported disclosing use to a provider, and 48% reported they would continue to use DS. Overall, 6% of participants were asked, disclosed, and had documentation of DS. Logistic regression revealed increased age associated with lower odds of DS documentation. Identifying as Hispanic or African American reduces DS documentation odds compared to those identifying as white.

Conclusions: There is lack of consistent DS medical reconciliation in the inpatient setting. While more than half of patients used DS prior to hospitalization, most were not asked about use on admission.

Practice Implications: This study adds to literature on medical reconciliation which requires that providers inquire and document patient DS use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404157PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical reconciliation
12
reconciliation dietary
8
logistic regression
8
documentation
5
dietary supplements
4
supplements objective
4
objective explore
4
explore inpatient
4
inpatient reconciliation
4
dietary supplement
4

Similar Publications

Guidance reconciliation and practice question prioritization for a World Health Organization's Ebola and Marburg Disease guideline.

J Clin Epidemiol

December 2024

Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Objective: To describe the processes of reconciling overlapping guidance and prioritizing practice questions for a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline on Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) for Ebola and Marburg disease.

Methods: This work involved the reconciliation of guidance, the generation of potential practice questions and the prioritization of those questions. Contributors included the WHO secretariat, the WHO steering group, the guideline methodologists, and the guideline development group (GDG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current state of APPE-readiness assessments in schools or colleges of pharmacy.

Curr Pharm Teach Learn

December 2024

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 North 12th Street, Richmond, VA 23298, United States of America. Electronic address:

Objective: To determine components and assessments included in Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness plans in United States Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs.

Methods: An electronic survey was emailed to the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Laboratory Instructors Special Interest Group. Survey items included demographic information about the program, APPE-readiness plan implementation status and components.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evidence indicates a lack of clarity regarding the contributions of interventions aimed at optimizing pharmacotherapy, primarily guided by pharmaceutical care, for clinically significant improvements in older individuals. Thus, there is a need to deepen the understanding of this scenario and the factors involved. Therefore, this study aims to map and summarize scientific evidence regarding experiences and strategies employed in providing pharmaceutical services and interventions in geriatric wards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Over 40% of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medications while receiving anticancer treatment.

Eur J Hosp Pharm

December 2024

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background: The use of complementary and alternative medications (CAM) is popular among cancer patients. CAM includes vitamins, minerals, phytotherapy, homeopathy, nutritional supplements and probiotics. CAM use may lead to unwanted risks by interacting with anticancer drugs; therefore, it is important for healthcare providers to be aware of CAM use by their patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!