Objective: Evaluate the effect of outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs on prescribing, patient, microbial outcomes, and costs.

Design: Systematic review

Methods: Search of MEDLINE (2000 through November 2013), Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. We included English language studies with patient populations relevant to the United States (eg, infectious conditions, prescription services) evaluating stewardship programs in outpatient settings and reporting outcomes of interest. Data regarding study characteristics and outcomes were extracted and organized by intervention type.

Results: We identified 50 studies eligible for inclusion, with most (29 of 50; 58%) reporting on respiratory tract infections, followed by multiple/unspecified infections (17 of 50; 34%). We found medium-strength evidence that stewardship programs incorporating communication skills training and laboratory testing are associated with reductions in antimicrobial use, and low-strength evidence that other stewardship interventions are associated with improved prescribing. Patient-centered outcomes, which were infrequently reported, were not adversely affected. Medication costs were generally lower with stewardship interventions, but overall program costs were rarely reported. No studies reported microbial outcomes, and data regarding outpatient settings other than primary care clinics are limited.

Conclusions: Low- to moderate-strength evidence suggests that antimicrobial stewardship programs in outpatient settings improve antimicrobial prescribing without adversely effecting patient outcomes. Effectiveness depends on program type. Most studies were not designed to measure patient or resistance outcomes. Data regarding sustainability and scalability of interventions are limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2014.41DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outpatient settings
16
stewardship programs
16
antimicrobial stewardship
12
microbial outcomes
8
programs outpatient
8
evidence stewardship
8
stewardship interventions
8
outcomes data
8
outcomes
7
stewardship
6

Similar Publications

Importance: Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common indication for outpatient antimicrobial therapy. National guidelines for the management of uncomplicated UTI were published in 2011, but the extent to which they align with current practices, patient diversity, and pathogen biology, all of which have evolved greatly in the time since their publication, is not fully known.

Objective: To reevaluate the effectiveness and adverse event profile for first-line antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, and oral β-lactams for treating uncomplicated UTI in contemporary clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Esophageal motility disorders are commonly encountered in the outpatient setting during the evaluation of difficulty swallowing. They typically present with symptoms of dysphagia to solids or liquids, non-cardiac chest pain, or regurgitation. Practitioners rely on both invasive and non-invasive testing to evaluate these complaints, often utilizing endoscopy, fluoroscopic evaluations, and functional esophageal motility testing to characterize symptoms into formal motility disorders, when able.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Modern ART is evolving, allowing the use of new drug formulations and alternative routes of administration to oral therapy. Long-acting (LA) cabotegravir and rilpivirine, the first fully injectable antiretroviral regimen approved for clinical use, is a test case for this new route of administration, and an innovation with implications for the quality of life of people with HIV (PWH). However, its use requires a reorganization of outpatient clinics and outpatient services, and a number of issues remain to be defined regarding the management of PWH on LA drugs, including the correct selection of people who can be treated with LA cabotegravir and rilpivirine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Globally, there is an increasing demand for quality medical rehabilitation services. This is the first article of a two-part series showing the findings from the Rehabilitation Choices study in which the main aim was to understand the current landscape of decision-making, enablers and barriers to access appropriate rehabilitation services in the Australian setting. In Part 1, these insights were sought from a healthcare professionals' perspective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Despite significant improvements in universal newborn hearing screenings (NBHS), infants are still lost to follow-up (LTF) after failed screening, delaying timely diagnosis and intervention. The challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and its response likely exacerbated timely adherence to early diagnosis and intervention. This study aimed to assess the LTF rate for infants who did not pass their NBHS within Washington, DC and compare the LFT before and during the pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!