Purpose: To compare sciatic nerve regeneration in rats using three different techniques of repair.

Methods: Fifteen isogonics rats were divided into three groups according to the method used to repair a 5-mm long defect created in the sciatic nerve: autogenous graft (Group A), polyglycolic acid tube (PGAt) (Group B), and of the association of PGAt with the graft (Group C). Histological analysis, regenerated myelinated axon number count and functional analysis were used to compare after six weeks.

Results: There was no difference in fiber diameter and degree of myelinization presented by Groups A, B and C. Group B presented the lowest number of regenerated axons. The groups did not display any significant functional difference after walking track analysis (p<0.05).

Conclusion: No differences between the three groups in terms of functional recovery, although there were histological differences among them.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015001000006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polyglycolic acid
12
acid tube
12
nerve regeneration
8
regeneration rats
8
sciatic nerve
8
graft group
8
combined polyglycolic
4
tube autografting
4
autografting versus
4
versus autografting
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!