A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Incidental computed tomographic bladder wall abnormalities: harbinger or herring? | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of incidental radiographically identified bladder wall abnormalities in the absence of other urologic indications for evaluation.

Methods: All screening cystoscopy evaluations performed at our center over 4 years were identified using surgical logs. We identified patients for whom cystoscopy was performed for a radiographic bladder wall abnormality, defined as diffuse bladder wall thickening, focal bladder wall thickening, or intraluminal bladder mass. Patients with other indications for cystoscopy such as previous bladder cancer, pelvic radiation, or hematuria were excluded. The outcomes including any relevant biopsy or malignant diagnosis were recorded.

Results: A total of 2483 cystoscopies were performed in 1418 unique patients, with 34 (2%) performed for radiographic bladder wall abnormalities in the absence of other indications for cystoscopy. Eleven of 34 patients (32.4%) were evaluated for diffuse bladder wall thickening, of which 2 had high-grade carcinoma. Fifteen patients (44.1%) had focal bladder wall thickening, all negative at cystoscopy. Four of the 8 patients (23.5%) evaluated for bladder mass had disease (1 high grade, 3 low grade).

Conclusion: Although generally nonspecific for malignancy, incidental radiographic finding of bladder wall abnormality led to diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in >15% of our patients including 3 worrisome tumors. This finding argues for routine cystoscopy in patients with radiographic bladder wall abnormality even in the absence of hematuria.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bladder wall
40
wall thickening
16
bladder
13
wall abnormalities
12
radiographic bladder
12
wall abnormality
12
wall
10
abnormalities absence
8
patients
8
performed radiographic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!