Purpose: To determine the incidence and reasons for hardware removal after operative fixation of distal radius fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent removal of a volar distal radius plate from 2007 to 2013. We recorded the primary reason for plate removal, patient sex, body mass index, AO fracture type, and plate manufacturer. The total number of both distal radius plating procedures and implant removals was analyzed.

Results: Of the 33 patients who underwent implant removal, the most common reasons for removal were pain (30%), tenosynovitis (27%), malunion (24%), infection (12%), nonunion (6%), and tendon rupture (3%). The most common AO fracture types requiring plate removal were A2, C2, and C3 (7 each). A total of 517 distal radius fractures received plate fixation at our institution from 2007 to 2009, a number that rose to 610 from 2010 to 2012. The number of distal radius plate removals over that same time was relatively constant at 17 and 16, respectively.

Conclusions: We advise continued review of reasons for implant removal to limit future hardware complications related to volar plating of distal radius fractures.

Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distal radius
24
incidence reasons
8
reasons hardware
8
removal
8
hardware removal
8
removal operative
8
operative fixation
8
fixation distal
8
radius fractures
8
patients underwent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!