Quality of survival assessment in European childhood brain tumour trials, for children aged 5 years and over.

Eur J Paediatr Neurol

Rehabilitation Department for children with acquired neurological injury, Saint Maurice Hospitals, Saint Maurice, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7371, UMR_S 1146, LIB, F-75005, Paris, France.

Published: March 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • There is a growing awareness of the long-term effects childhood brain tumors can have on survival quality, especially as survival rates exceed 75%.
  • The position statement aims to standardize assessments and gather a unified data set across Europe to enable effective comparison of outcomes based on various treatment methods.
  • Key assessment areas include medical domains like vision and mobility, as well as emotional and cognitive functioning, with a 'core plus' approach recommended for consistent evaluation in clinical trials.

Article Abstract

Introduction: There is increasing recognition of the long-term sequelae of brain tumours treated in childhood. Five year survival rates now exceed 75% and assessing the quality of survival (QoS) in multiple domains is essential to any comparison of the benefits and harms of treatment regimens.

Aim: The aim of this position statement is to rationalise assessments and facilitate collection of a common data set across Europe. Sufficient numbers of observations can then be made to enable reliable comparisons between outcomes following different tumour types and treatments.

Methods: This paper represents the consensus view of the QoS working group of the Brain Tumour group of the European Society of Paediatric Oncology regarding domains of QoS to prioritise for assessment in clinical trials. This consensus between clinicians and researchers across Europe has been arrived at by discussion and collaboration over the last eight years.

Results: Areas of assessment discussed include core medical domains (e.g. vision, hearing, mobility, endocrine), emotion, behaviour, adaptive behaviour and cognitive functioning.

Conclusions: A 'core plus' approach is suggested in which core assessments (both direct and indirect tests) are recommended for all clinical trials. The core component is a relatively brief screening assessment that, in most countries, is a sub-component of routine clinical provision. The 'plus' components enable the addition of assessments which can be selected by individual countries and/or tumour-, age-, and location-specific groups. The implementation of a QoS protocol common to all European clinical studies of childhood brain tumours is also discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2014.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality survival
8
childhood brain
8
brain tumour
8
brain tumours
8
clinical trials
8
assessment
4
survival assessment
4
assessment european
4
european childhood
4
brain
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!