A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in screening immunoassays in blood establishments: computation of diagnostic accuracy models. | LitMetric

Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in screening immunoassays in blood establishments: computation of diagnostic accuracy models.

Transfus Apher Sci

International Consultancy in Blood Components Quality/Safety Improvement, Audit / Inspection and DDR Strategy, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: February 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The European Union regulation does not require blood establishments to evaluate measurement uncertainty in virology screening tests, unlike ISO 15189 guidelines which emphasize this evaluation.
  • Researchers have debated GUM modular approaches in medical laboratories but haven't reached a consensus on how to apply them practically.
  • The article reviews and proposes probability-based models for diagnostic accuracy in blood screening tests as alternatives to traditional measurement uncertainty concepts, demonstrating their effectiveness with a case study on anti-HCV testing.

Article Abstract

The European Union regulation for blood establishments does not require the evaluation of measurement uncertainty in virology screening tests, which is required by ISO 15189 guideline following GUM principles. GUM modular approaches have been discussed by medical laboratory researchers but no consensus has been achieved regarding practical application. Meanwhile, the application of empirical approaches fulfilling GUM principles has gained support. Blood establishments' screening tests accredited by ISO 15189 need to select an appropriate model even GUM models are intended uniquely for quantitative examination procedures. Alternative (to GUM) models focused on probability have been proposed in medical laboratories' diagnostic tests. This article reviews, discusses and proposes models for diagnostic accuracy in blood establishments' screening tests. The output of these models is an alternative to VIM's measurement uncertainty concept. Example applications are provided for an anti-HCV test where calculations were performed using a commercial spreadsheet. The results show that these models satisfy ISO 15189 principles and that the estimation of clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity, binary results agreement and area under the ROC curve are alternatives to the measurement uncertainty concept.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2014.12.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurement uncertainty
16
screening tests
12
iso 15189
12
evaluation measurement
8
blood establishments
8
diagnostic accuracy
8
gum principles
8
blood establishments'
8
establishments' screening
8
gum models
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!