Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the species distribution, slime activity, and methicillin resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from blood cultures as either contaminants or true bacteremia agents.
Materials And Methods: In this study, 13.268 blood culture samples sent to our laboratory from various clinics during a two-year period were examined in terms of the presence of CoNS to clarify whether the isolates are true bacteremia agents, as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. The slime activities of true bacteremia agents (58 CoNS strains) and contaminants (50 randomly selected CoNS strains) were investigated by the Christensen method. The methicillin susceptibilities of the strains were determined by the disk diffusion method.
Results: Although the frequency of slime production was 39.7% among the true bacteremia CoNS agents, it was 18% in CoNS that were judged to be contaminants (p<0.05). S. epidermidis was the most frequently isolated species for both the true bacteremia agent group (56.9%) and contaminant group (74%). Additionally, S. epidermidis was the bacterium most frequently characterized as slime producing in both groups. The methicillin resistance of slime-producing CoNS was determined to be 82.6% for the true bacteremia agent group and 77.8% for the contaminant group.
Conclusion: The presence of slime activity in CoNS isolated from blood culture samples is supportive evidence that they are most likely the agents of true bacteremia cases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261457 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eajm.2014.26 | DOI Listing |
Rev Esp Quimioter
November 2024
María Nieves Carmona Tello, Servicio de Microbiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, Avenida Marítima del Sur, s/n, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Objective: Anaerobic bacteremia represents 0.5-12% of all bacteremias and its mortality is high, ranging from 25-44%. The aim was to know our data to compare them with existing data and demonstrate the importance of actively searching for these microorganisms in blood culture samples.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Microbiol Rev
December 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
SUMMARYBlood cultures (BCs) are one of the critical tests used to detect bloodstream infections. BC results are not 100% specific. Interpretation of BC results is often complicated by detecting microbial contamination rather than true infection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAC Antimicrob Resist
October 2024
Infectious Diseases, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.
Objectives: species are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, representing a true opportunistic and multi-drug-resistant pathogen to immunocompromised or vulnerable hosts. Despite this, data are lacking regarding optimal management strategy for infections with this organism, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We describe patient characteristics, management and outcomes in this case series.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWMJ
September 2024
Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Background: Probiotics are synthetic oral supplements containing live bacterial and fungal species hypothesized to help with various gastrointestinal conditions. However, they can cause infection if the organism spreads outside of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to identify and describe patients who experienced systemic infections caused by probiotic use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Infect Chemother
September 2024
Hospital Infection Control Center, Oita University Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Introduction: A blood culture (BC) test is vital for diagnosing bacteremia in clinical practice. Although incubation time varies among automated BC systems, 4-5 days is deemed to be sufficient time for the BD BACTEC FX blood culture system. This study compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics of true-positive BC samples on day 5 with those within 4 days to reduce missed true bacteremia cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!