Ultrasound-assisted versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

From the Division of Angiology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland (R.P.E., A.A.); Clinic for Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland (R.P.E., T.W., D.-D.D., I.B., N.K.); and Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Switzerland (D.S.).

Published: January 2015

Background: For patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, it remains unclear whether the addition of intravascular high-frequency, low-power ultrasound energy facilitates the resolution of thrombosis during catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Methods And Results: In a controlled clinical trial, 48 patients (mean age 50 ± 21 years, 52% women) with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis were randomized to receive ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (N = 24) or conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (N = 24). Thrombolysis regimen (20 mg r-tPA over 15 hours) was identical in all patients. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of thrombus load reduction from baseline to 15 hours according to the length-adjusted thrombus score, obtained from standardized venograms and evaluated by a core laboratory blinded to group assignment. The percentage of thrombus load reduction was 55% ± 27% in the ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis group and 54% ± 27% in the conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis group (P = 0.91). Adjunctive angioplasty and stenting was performed in 19 (80%) patients and in 20 (83%) patients, respectively (P > 0.99). Treatment-related complications occurred in 3 (12%) and 2 (8%) patients, respectively (P > 0.99). At 3-month follow-up, primary venous patency was 100% in the ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis group and 96% in the conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis group (P = 0.33), and there was no difference in the severity of the post-thrombotic syndrome (mean Villalta score: 3.0 ± 3.9 [range 0-15] versus 1.9 ± 1.9 [range 0-7]; P=0.21), respectively.

Conclusions: In this randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with a fixed-dose catheter thrombolysis regimen, the addition of intravascular ultrasound did not facilitate thrombus resolution.

Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01482273.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

catheter-directed thrombolysis
28
conventional catheter-directed
16
acute iliofemoral
16
iliofemoral deep
16
deep vein
16
vein thrombosis
16
thrombolysis group
16
ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed
12
thrombolysis
9
catheter-directed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!