Establishment and validation of ALPH-Q score to predict mortality risk in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure: a prospective cohort study.

Medicine (Baltimore)

From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (S-JW, Z-XZ, B-ZY, W-JH), the Heart Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou; Department of Infectious Diseases (H-DY), Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo; Department of Infection and Liver Diseases (K-QS, F-LW, Y-PC, M-HZ), Liver Research Center (K-QS, F-LW, Y-PC, M-HZ), the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Institute of Hepatology, Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Clinical Laboratory (Y-YX), the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou; Department of Hepatology (Y-CF), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Published: January 2015

Currently, there are no robust models for predicting the outcome of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF). We aimed to establish and validate a new prognostic scoring system, named ALPH-Q, that integrates electrocardiography parameters that may be used to predict short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF. Two hundred fourteen patients were included in this study. The APLH-Q score was constructed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and was validated in an independent patient cohort. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to compare the performance of different models, including APLH-Q, Child-Pugh score (CPS), model of end-stage liver disease (MELD), and a previously reported logistic regression model (LRM). The APLH-Q score was constructed with 5 independent risk factors, including age (HR = 1.034, 95% CI: 1.007-1.061), liver cirrhosis (HR = 2.753, 95% CI: 1.366-5.548), prothrombin time (HR = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.002-1.062), hepatic encephalopathy (HR = 2.703, 95% CI: 1.630-4.480), and QTc (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.001-1.016). The performance of the ALPH-Q score was significantly better than that of MELD and CPS in both the training (0.896 vs 0.712, 0.896 vs 0.738, respectively, both P < 0.05) and validation cohorts (0.837 vs 0.689, 0.837 vs 0.585, respectively, both P < 0.05). Compared with LRM, APLH-Q also showed a better performance (0.896 vs 0.825, 0.837 vs 0.818, respectively).We have developed a novel APLH-Q score with greater performance than CPS, MELD, and LRM for predicting short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602548PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000403DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aplh-q score
12
alph-q score
8
acute-on-chronic hepatitis
8
hepatitis liver
8
liver failure
8
short-term mortality
8
mortality patients
8
patients achblf
8
score constructed
8
lrm aplh-q
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!