Background: Current guidelines favor the use of lidocaine in liposuction wetting solutions. The use of bupivacaine as an alternative remains controversial despite reports of its use with safe and favorable outcomes suggesting faster postoperative recovery time secondary to improved pain control. The goals of this study were to determine the prevalence of bupivacaine use, examine liposuction practices of bupivacaine users, and elucidate opinions regarding bupivacaine use.
Methods: An online survey was distributed to 2500 randomly selected members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Data were collected and analyzed with special attention toward the practice and opinions of bupivacaine use.
Results: The response rate of the survey met the average American Society of Plastic Surgeons online survey response rate at 12.8% (n=320). Respondents (7.2%; n=22) reported using bupivacaine in their wetting solutions (bupivacaine group) and provided a dosage range of 62.5 to 150 mg. Respondents (83.5%; n=254) reported using either lidocaine or prilocaine (no-bupivacaine group). There were no reports of bupivacaine toxicity in 2011. The demographic profile and liposuction practices of both groups were comparable. Although 36% of the no-bupivacaine group did not know or had no opinion on when it is appropriate to use bupivacaine in liposuction wetting solutions, 85% of this group has used bupivacaine for other clinical purposes.
Conclusions: A review of 320 plastic surgeons' experiences revealed that 7% of respondents are using bupivacaine in their tumescent solutions with no reported cases of toxicity. Bupivacaine users differed dramatically only in their opinion regarding the safety of bupivacaine in tumescent liposuction. The recent studies suggesting better postoperative pain control with bupivacaine along with the proportion of respondents reporting bupivacaine use call for distinct guidelines on bupivacaine use in liposuction. Further studies, including a rigorous clinical trial documenting the safety and efficacy of bupivacaine when compared with lidocaine, would be warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000420 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
November 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Bokwang Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Background: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain control and analgesic requirements following laparoscopy-assisted transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block compared to port site infiltration post-paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy. A Randomised controlled trial.
Pediatr Surg Int
January 2025
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
Background: Appendicectomy is a common procedure in children. Regional anaesthesia helps reduce requirements for opioids and hospital stay and enhances recovery. Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane block (L-TAP) was shown to be efficient and potentially superior to port site infiltration (PSI); however, this was not previously studied in paediatric appendicitis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDexmedetomidine versus hyaluronidase along with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in failed back surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)
November 2024
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Alfayoum University, Alfayoum, Egypt.
Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem faced by chronic pain management specialists. Steroid-only epidural injections have modest efficacy because of excessive scarring. Epidural hyaluronidase (HA), functions as a depolymerizing agent, successfully breaking down adhesions and collagen bundles, whereas dexmedetomidine (DEX) helps to reduce inflammation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan erector spinae plane block replace intrathecal morphine in cesarean section? A prospective randomized controlled study on opioid consumption.
Clin J Pain
January 2025
Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objectives: After cesarean, optimal analgesia is important for early mobilization, mitigating thromboembolic risks, and mother-infant communication. Our study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Methods: 82 patients were randomized into ESPB and ITM groups.
Bupivacaine multivesicular liposomes/meloxicam nanocrystals in a thermosensitive gel adapted to the "microenvironment" for long-term analgesia.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm
January 2025
National Advanced Medical Engineering Research Center, China State Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry, Shanghai 201203 PR China. Electronic address:
Current analgesics on the market exhibit a short duration of action and induce the production of inflammatory factors in tissues damaged by surgical procedures. Inflammatory factor production can create acidic environments, limiting drug delivery. In this study, we developed a novel injectable formulation comprising bupivacaine multivesicular liposomes of high osmotic pressure (H-MVL) and meloxicam nanocrystals (MLX) in a thermosensitive gel (H-MVL/MLX@GEL) adapted to the microenvironment for long-term postoperative analgesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!