Colonic salvage with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis.

Dis Colon Rectum

Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.

Published: February 2015

Background: Following colon resection, the construction of a well-perfused, tension-free isoperistaltic anastomosis can be made difficult by multiple factors including prior abdominal surgery or compromised vascular supply. Here, we describe the technique of antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis as a method for preserving viable colon without compromising functional outcome.

Technique: Following extensive colorectal resection, different techniques for isoperistaltic reconstruction using the cecum and ascending colon have been described, including the Deloyers procedure and limited isoperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis. However, these isoperistaltic reconstructions often require ligation of the middle colic and right colic arteries and/or sacrifice of viable distal colon to aid reconstruction. In complex situations that require preservation of normal vascular anatomy, an antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis can be constructed that maintains the orientation of the vascular pedicle. In addition to the preservation of the colonic arterial supply, a distinguishing feature of this technique is the substantial portion of antiperistaltic colon that is preserved and interposed to reestablish continuity.

Results: In a case where it was used, construction of an antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis was technically successful and led to a good functional outcome.

Conclusion: Antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis should be considered as an option in colonic reconstruction for patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery or when complex anatomic issues require preservation of native vascular anatomy. In these situations, this technique offers several advantages over isoperistaltic reconstruction and may be the only option for reconstruction that uses the remaining cecum and colon.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000306DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cecorectal anastomosis
24
antiperistaltic cecorectal
20
prior abdominal
8
abdominal surgery
8
isoperistaltic reconstruction
8
require preservation
8
vascular anatomy
8
anastomosis
7
antiperistaltic
6
cecorectal
6

Similar Publications

[Surgical treatment for slow transit constipation: total colectomy and subtotal colectomy].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi

December 2024

Department of General Surgery, the Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Chongqing400042, China.

Although the surgical treatment of slow transit constipation (STC) has been around for over a century, the choice of surgical method is still controversial. Specifically, the two most widely used operations in the world are total colectomy ileorectostomy (TC-IRA) and subtotal colectomy. Subtotal colectomy offers many methods for anastomosis, including ileocecal and cecorectal anastomoses and so on.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical treatment has been widely used in patients with refractory slow transit constipation (RSTC). The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the effects of different colectomies on short-term postoperative complications and quality of life in patients with RSTC. Electronic literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials databases and were searched up to December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) and laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (SC-ACRA) on adults with slow transit constipation (STC). One hundred and three patients with STC were assigned to the TC-IRA group (n = 53) and the SC-ACRA group (n = 50). The clinical data were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: We conducted this meta-analysis, to compare cecorectal (CRA) and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), regarding perioperative safety and efficacy, in patients submitted to colectomy for refractory slow transit constipation (STC).

Methods: This study followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. To identify all eligible records, a systematic literature search in the electronic scholar databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science) was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!