AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the responsiveness and recovery of the GRASSP instrument in tracking upper limb function after cervical spinal cord injury over a year.
  • Researchers conducted a prospective study with 74 participants, measuring GRASSP at various intervals and comparing it with other established assessments (UEMS, LT, SCIM-SS, CROM).
  • Results indicated that GRASSP was highly responsive to changes in strength and prehension, showing strong correlations with other measurement tools and detecting significant recovery, especially between 1 and 3 months post-injury.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the internal and external responsiveness and recovery profiles of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) instrument in revealing changes in upper limb function within the first year following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

Method: A European prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study assessing the GRASSP at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after cervical SCI. Subtests of GRASSP were compared to the upper extremity motor (UEMS) and light touch scores (LT) according to the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure self-care subscore (SCIM-SS), as well as a clinician-rated outcome measure (CROM) of clinical relevance. Data were analyzed for GRASSP responsiveness and recovery rate over time.

Results: Seventy-four participants entered the study. GRASSP subtests proved responsive (standardized response mean [SRM] ranged from 0.79 to 1.48 for strength, 0.50 to 1.03 for prehension, and 0.14 to 0.64 for sensation) between all examination time points. In comparison, UEMS and LT showed lower responsiveness (SRM UEMS ranged from 0.69 to 1.29 and SRM LT ranged from 0.30 to -0.13). All GRASSP subtests revealed significant, moderate-to-excellent correlations with UEMS, LT, and SCIM-SS at each time point, and changes in GRASSP subtests were in accordance with the CROM. GRASSP prehension and motor recovery was largest between 1 and 3 months.

Conclusion: The GRASSP showed excellent responsiveness, detecting distinct changes in strength and prehension relating to the severity of cervical SCI. It detected clinically significant changes complimentary to the ISNCSCI and SCIM-SS assessments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968314565466DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal cord
16
cord injury
12
grassp subtests
12
grassp
10
changes strength
8
cervical spinal
8
study grassp
8
responsiveness recovery
8
cervical sci
8
changes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!