Names of infamy: tainted eponyms.

J Clin Neurosci

Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Published: April 2015

The use of eponyms is controversial. A distinction must be made between those doctors and scientists after whom disorders and syndromes are named in honour of their discoveries, and those whose discoveries were made as a result of maltreatment of defenceless prisoners, utilizing specimens from victims of Nazi extermination policies, and euthanasia victims of racial policies. The second group of scientists should have their names expunged from the historical record, and their deeds brought to the attention of their colleagues. We are not however advocating the abolition of eponyms in general, only tainted ones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

names infamy
4
infamy tainted
4
tainted eponyms
4
eponyms eponyms
4
eponyms controversial
4
controversial distinction
4
distinction doctors
4
doctors scientists
4
scientists disorders
4
disorders syndromes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!