Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of all locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) patients who were referred to a tertiary care center. The study examined LRRC patients who underwent surgery after prior total mesorectal excision.

Method: The data of 213 consecutive LRRC patients who were registered in a database between 2001 and 2010 were accessed.

Results: A total of 115 patients (54 %) with a median age of 63 (range 34-81) years underwent tumor resection. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.8 % (95 % CI 0.02-4 %), and the complication rate was 42 % (95 % CI 33-51 %). R0 resection was achieved in 70 patients (61 %), R1 resection in 38 patients (33 %), and R2 resection in 7 patients (6 %). The 3- and 5-year survival rates for R0 resections were 55 % (95 % CI 41-66) and 40 % (95 % CI 26-53), respectively; 42 % (95 % CI 26-58) and 16 % (95 % CI 5-31), respectively, for R1 resections; no patients who received an R2 resection survived to the 3-year mark. Patients with prior abdominoperineal excision (APE) had significantly poorer survival rates than patients with prior resection with anastomosis (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Acceptable long-term survival can be achieved for patients undergoing surgery for LRRC, but radical resection is mandatory. Prior APE was associated with poorer survival rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4317-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lrrc patients
12
survival rates
12
patients
11
locally recurrent
8
recurrent rectal
8
rectal cancer
8
total mesorectal
8
42 % 95 %
8
achieved patients
8
resection patients
8

Similar Publications

Background: The modern approach to treating rectal cancer, which involves total mesorectal excision directed by imaging assessments, has significantly enhanced patient outcomes. However, locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) continues to be a significant clinical issue. Identifying LRRC through imaging is complex, due to the mismatch between fibrosis and inflammatory pelvic tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) previously treated with radiotherapy is associated with a poor prognosis. Historically, the integration of radiotherapy (RT) with surgery has improved the likelihood of complete resections (R0) and, consequently, enhanced survival. Unfortunately, many LRRC cases are not amenable to surgical intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current Management of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

Cancers (Basel)

November 2024

UOC Chirurgia Digestiva e del Colon-Retto, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), which occurs in 6-12% of patients previously treated with surgery, with or without pre-operative chemoradiation therapy, represents a complex and heterogeneous disease profoundly affecting the patient's quality of life (QoL) and long-term survival. Its management usually requires a multidisciplinary approach, to evaluate the several aspects of a LRRC, such as resectability or the best approach to reduce symptoms. Surgical treatment is more complex and usually needs high-volume centers to obtain a higher rate of radical (R0) resections and to reduce the rate of postoperative complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ten-year survival and pattern of recurrence in patients with locally recurrent rectal or sigmoid cancer undergoing resection.

Colorectal Dis

December 2024

Section for Abdominal Cancer Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Surgical Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Aim: The aim of this work is to report actual overall survival (AOS) at 5 and 10 years after multimodal treatment for locally recurrent rectal or sigmoid cancer (LRRC) and the importance of local re-recurrence (reLRRC) and distant metastases for AOS.

Method: All patients resected for LRRC at a single centre between years 1990 and 2007 were included. Resections were based on images taken after neoadjuvant treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Registry-based study comparing health-related quality of life between patients with primary rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Eur J Surg Oncol

December 2024

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Aim: National clinical registries offer the benefits of a comprehensive dataset, particularly when linked with patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. This aim of this study was to utilise UK registry data to assess cross-sectional differences in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with primary rectal (PRC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

Materials And Methods: Data were extracted from the COloRECTal cancer Repository (CORECT-R) and the Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer - Quality of Life (LRRC-QoL) datasets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!