Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.

Objective: To describe the clinical outcomes of histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix treated with cervical conization.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with histologically confirmed AIS from July 1998 to February 2011 included 52 patients. The rates of residual disease in subsequent excisions, the clinical recurrence rate, the average disease-free interval, and risk of progression to adenocarcinoma were described. The clinical outcomes of patients treated with cold knife cone (CKC) and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) were compared.

Results: Fifteen LEEPs and 37 CKC procedures were performed as initial treatment and 26 patients (50%) had positive margins. There was no significant difference in rate of positive margins between LEEP and CKC (40% vs. 54%, respectively. p = 0.55). LEEPs and CKCs resulted in similar volumes of cervical tissue resected (4.98 cm3 vs. 5.04 cm3, p = 0.40). Of patients with positive margins, ten underwent immediate hysterectomy, six underwent a second cone biopsy, seven were managed expectantly, and four were lost to follow up. Residual AIS was found in 47% (eight of 17) of repeat cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens performed for positive cone margins. Of the 26 patients with negative cone margins, no residual or recurrent disease was found after an average follow-up of 32 months.

Conclusions: A positive surgical margin was associated with residual disease in 47% of patients with AIS treated with conization. No patient with negative cone margins had recurrent or progressive disease. Cervical conization with negative margins appears to be a safe treatment option for patients with AIS but requires further investigation. CKC and LEEP were equally efficacious treatments in our study population.