Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: 3D ultrasound (US) imaging has the potential to become a powerful alternative imaging modality in orthopaedic surgery as it is radiation-free and can produce 3D images (in contrast to fluoroscopy) in near-real time. Conventional B-mode US images, however, are characterized by high levels of noise and reverberation artifacts, image quality is user-dependent, and bone surfaces are blurred, which makes it difficult to both interpret images and to use them as a basis for navigated interventions. 3D US has great potential to assist orthopaedic care, possibly assisting during surgery if the anatomical structures of interest could be localized and visualized with sufficient accuracy and clarity and in a highly automated rapid manner.
Methods: In this paper, we present clinical results for a novel 3D US segmentation technique we have recently developed based on multi-resolution analysis to localize bone surfaces in 3D US volumes. Our method is validated on scans obtained from 29 trauma patients with distal radius and pelvic ring fractures.
Results: Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate remarkably clear segmentations of bone surfaces with an average surface fitting error of 0.62 mm (standard deviation (SD) of 0.42 mm) for pelvic patients and 0.21 mm (SD 0.14 mm) for distal radius patients.
Conclusions: These results suggest that our technique is sufficiently accurate for potential use in orthopaedic trauma applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1141-6 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!