Coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: a retrospective study of 185 procedures and the decision to repeat the coronectomy in cases of failure.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Oral and Maxillofacial Specialist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Published: April 2015

Purpose: A prevalent complication associated with mandibular third molar extraction is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. This study evaluated the success rate of coronectomy and, in the event of failure of the procedure, retreatment.

Patients And Methods: One hundred seventy-three patients underwent 185 coronectomy procedures of the mandibular third molar to prevent IAN injury. The coronectomy was performed along the cementoenamel junction. Residual roots were trimmed 3 to 4 mm below the crest margin. No pulp treatment was performed and the roots were left vital. A postoperative orthopantogram was recorded immediately after the procedure or at follow-up 1 month later. Two additional orthopantographic views were taken at 6- and 12-month follow-up appointments. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in root migration, pain, wound healing and failure by age, gender, and time elapsed from coronectomy. Statistical data were considered significant at a P value less than .05.

Results: Statistical differences in the migration of residual roots from 6 to 12 months were found. Migration of the roots was found in younger patients. In a total of 10 cases of failure, 4 were treated with repeat coronectomy. The other 6 cases were treated with reoperation (ie, removal of residual roots).

Conclusion: Immediate postoperative radiographic imaging is recommended, as well as, follow-up evaluation 12 months after surgery. In addition, repeat coronectomy is recommended for cases in which enamel retention is diagnosed to prevent residual roots from becoming infected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mandibular third
12
third molar
12
repeat coronectomy
12
residual roots
12
coronectomy
8
coronectomy cases
8
cases failure
8
ian injury
8
roots
5
coronectomy mandibular
4

Similar Publications

Background: Establishing accurate, reliable, and convenient methods for enamel segmentation and analysis is crucial for effectively planning endodontic, orthodontic, and restorative treatments, as well as exploring the evolutionary patterns of mammals. However, no mature, non-destructive method currently exists in clinical dentistry to quickly, accurately, and comprehensively assess the integrity and thickness of enamel chair-side. This study aims to develop a deep learning work, 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate the clinical application effect of the along-axis extraction method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTM) and to compare the biomechanical characteristics of different root extraction techniques through three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Methods: A total of 68 patients requiring IMTM extraction were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group underwent the along-axis extraction method, while the control group underwent the traditional buccal bone removal and root extraction method. The duration of the procedure, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Protraction of a second molar and a mesially-impacted third molar into the adjacent first-molar extraction site through mini-implant anchored Albert protraction loop with the aid of alveolar ridge augmentation.

Int Orthod

January 2025

Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China. Electronic address:

Protraction of a mandibular second molar to substitute the adjacent missing first molar is challenging in clinical practice. In this case report, we demonstrated a 21-year-old patient with an untreatable periapical lesion of the mandibular right first molar. The adjacent mandibular second molar had normal root length and the third molar was mesially-impacted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review was to analyze the overall prevalence of distal caries in mandibular second molars (MSMs) associated with the presence of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs). Secondary objectives were to determine how IMTM position and level of impaction influence the occurrence of distal caries.

Materials And Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Coronectomy is a valuable treatment proven safe for non-pathological mandibular third molars with an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Coronectomy may also be useful for mandibular third molars with dentigerous cysts and caries, but this is not commonly performed due to the lack of well-designed, evidence-based studies. Here, we aim to investigate the safety of coronectomy for mandibular third molars with caries and dentigerous cysts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!