Objectives: To evaluate hepatoprotective potential of carvedilol, prazosin, metoprolol and prazosin plus metoprolol in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-six male rabbits were divided into six groups, six in each, group 1 received distilled water, group 2 were treated with paracetamol (1 g/kg/day, orally), group 3, 4,5 and 6 were treated at a dose in (mg/kg/day) of the following: Carvedilol (10 mg), prazosin (0.5 mg), metoprolol (10 mg), and a combination of metoprolol (10 mg) and prazosin (0.5 mg) respectively 1 h before paracetamol treatment. All treatments were given for 9 days; animals were sacrificed at day 10. Liver function tests, malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) in serum and liver homogenates were estimated. Histopathological examinations of liver were performed.
Results: Histopathological changes of hepatotoxicity were found in all paracetamol-treated rabbits. The histopathological findings of paracetamol toxicity disappeared in five rabbits on prazosin, very mild in one. In carvedilol group paracetamol toxicity completely disappeared in three, while mild in three rabbits. Paracetamol hepatotoxicity was not changed by metoprolol. In metoprolol plus prazosin treated rabbits, moderate histopathological changes were observed. Serum liver function tests and MDA in serum and in liver homogenate were elevated; GSH was depleted after paracetamol treatment and returned back to the control value on prior treatment with prazosin. MDA in serum and liver homogenate, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin were significantly decreased after carvedilol and prazosin plus metoprolol treatments.
Conclusion: Carvedilol and prazosin are hepatoprotective in paracetamol hepatotoxicity, combination of prazosin and metoprolol have moderate, and metoprolol has a little hepatoprotection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264082 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.144937 | DOI Listing |
Se Pu
October 2024
Joint Laboratory for Research on Active Components and Pharmacological Mechanism of Tibetan MateriaMedica of Tibetan Medical Research Center of Tibet, Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang 712082, China.
Receptor chromatography is an efficient analytical technique that combines the high separation ability of chromatography with the high specificity of receptors for drug recognition. In addition, this technique offers the advantages of active recognition, online separation, and convenient multidimensional target tracking. This strategy allows target active ingredients in complex systems, such as traditional Chinese medicines, to be efficiently screened and accurately identified.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
December 2023
Hebei Institute of Drug and Medical Device Inspection, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
To determine the concentrations of nine drugs used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in human plasma through QuEChERS pre-treatment combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma samples were extracted with 3 mL of acetonitrile, 400 mg of anhydrous magnesium sulfate as a salting agent, and 20 mg of C18 as a sorbent. An Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol India
August 2022
Department of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Introduction: Pheochromocytoma during pregnancy is a rare cause of secondary hypertension with lethal consequences to both mother and fetus. As patients are young, the possibility of syndromic associations like MEN-2, VHL, NF-1, etc., needs to be considered.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Razi Inst
February 2022
Department of Clinical Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
The current study was conducted to investigate the interaction between the central adrenergic and histaminergic systems and the broiler chick's feed intake. In the first experiment, the intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of solutions was conducted which included 10 nmol of prazosin (an α-receptor antagonist), 300 nmol of histamine, co-injection of prazosin and histamine. Experiments two to five were conducted similarly the same as the first experiment, in which chickens were ICV injected with 13 nmol of yohimbine (an α-receptor antagonist), 24 nmol of metoprolol (a β adrenergic receptor antagonist), 5 nmol of ICI 118,551 (a β adrenergic receptor antagonist), and 20 nmol of SR 59230R (a β adrenergic receptor antagonist).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!