A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Recovery of salivary DNA from the skin after showering. | LitMetric

Recovery of salivary DNA from the skin after showering.

Forensic Sci Med Pathol

Forensic Science Graduate Program, University of California, Davis, 1909 Galileo Court, Suite B, Davis, CA, 95618, USA,

Published: March 2015

Purpose: After sexual assault there is a limited amount of time before the DNA evidence on the surface of the victim's body is not recoverable. During an assault, the offender may leave saliva on the victim's skin. Traditional examination methods use a swabbing technique to collect saliva for DNA testing. Victim activity, especially hygiene activity such as showering, may negatively affect DNA recovery.

Methods: In this experiment, we compared two techniques for recovery of salivary DNA from the skin's surface after a victim showers. We compared the traditional swabbing method to a "wet-vacuum" method using the M-Vac© to collect saliva from four body regions (neck, arm, stomach, and leg). In our research, we tested whether either collection technique obtained enough salivary DNA for autosomal and Y-STR analysis. In addition, we tested whether the M-Vac© is more effective at collecting DNA from large surface areas than traditional methods, by determining the amount of DNA collected.

Results: With both collection techniques, we were able to obtain male salivary DNA from at least one body region of the female after she had showered. There was no statistical difference in the amount of DNA collected between the swabbing technique and the M-Vac©. Autosomal STR analysis failed to detect the male contributor's DNA; therefore, we used Y-STRs. With Y-STR analysis, 47 samples returned a full male profile, and 26 samples returned a partial male profile after sample concentration.

Conclusions: This research shows that salivary DNA can be collected from skin after showering and successfully analyzed using Y-STRs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9635-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

salivary dna
20
dna
12
recovery salivary
8
skin showering
8
swabbing technique
8
collect saliva
8
y-str analysis
8
amount dna
8
dna collected
8
samples returned
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!