A blinded randomized assessment of laser Doppler flowmetry efficacy in standardizing outcome from intraluminal filament MCAO in the rat.

J Neurosci Methods

Multidisciplinary Neuroprotection Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address:

Published: February 2015

Background: Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is widely used for estimating cerebral blood flow changes during intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). No investigation has systematically examined LDF efficacy in standardizing outcome. We examined MCAO histologic and behavioral outcome as a function of LDF measurement.

Materials And Methods: Rats were subjected to 90min MCAO by 4 surgeons having different levels of MCAO surgical experience. LDF was measured in all rats during ischemia. By random assignment, LDF values were (Assisted) or were not (Blinded) made available to each surgeon during MCAO (n=12-17 per group). Neurologic and histologic outcomes were measured 7 days post-MCAO. A second study examined LDF effects on 1-day post-MCAO outcome.

Results: Pooled across surgeons, intra-ischemic %LDF change (P=0.12), neurologic scores (Assisted vs. Blinded=14±6 vs. 13±7, P=0.61, mean±standard deviation) and cerebral infarct volume (162±63mm(3)vs. 143±86mm(3), P=0.24) were not different between groups. Only for one surgeon (novice) did LDF use alter infarct volume (145±28mm(3)vs. 98±61mm(3), P=0.03). LDF use decreased infarct volume coefficient of variation (COV) by 35% (P=0.02), but had no effect on neurologic score COV.

Comparison With Existing Methods: We compared intraluminal MCAO outcome as a function of LDF use.

Conclusions: LDF measurement altered neither neurologic nor histologic MCAO outcome. LDF did not decrease neurologic deficit COV, but did decrease infarct volume COV. LDF may allow use of fewer animals if infarct volume is the primary dependent variable, but is unlikely to impact requisite sample sizes if neurologic function is of primary interest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.12.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infarct volume
20
ldf
12
laser doppler
8
doppler flowmetry
8
efficacy standardizing
8
standardizing outcome
8
mcao
8
examined ldf
8
outcome function
8
function ldf
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!