Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The effect of factors such as design, alloy and coating type on bony or fibrous tissue ingrowth was evaluated in a study of 423 retrieved cementless acetabular shells representing 16 shell designs. Small-beaded (250μm) porous coatings, either with or without hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings, proved to be the superior porous surface for bone ingrowth. Small-beaded shells that were Duofix coated had predominantly fibrous tissue ingrowth. In addition to bead size, alloy type and surface type have significant effect on bone ingrowth. In contrast, there is no significant association between bone ingrowth and time in situ, with most bone ingrowth occurring early. Although roughened, press-fit shells have acceptable clinical and Registry data, they showed some of the lowest ingrowth/ongrowth scores of all the shells tested.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!