Objective: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal(®)Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS).

Materials And Methods: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color stability. Samples were randomly selected after the wear test for SEM imaging to analyze surface morphology.

Results: OS was significantly harder than PS (P < 0.001). PS was significantly more wear resistant than OS (P < 0.05). PS showed a greater ∆E*ab (increased staining) when placed in wine or coffee showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). SEM showed particle size, shape and distribution were different for PS and OS reflecting the pattern seen on wear surfaces.

Conclusion: Both orthodontic sealants are beneficial for protecting enamel. However with better wear properties PS was superior in resisting mechanical stresses. OS was more color stable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253104PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143630DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

orthodontic sealants
12
mechanical esthetic
8
esthetic properties
8
wear
5
in-vitro evaluation
4
evaluation mechanical
4
properties
4
properties orthodontic
4
sealants objective
4
objective evaluate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!