Purpose: To analyze the feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar screw placement in Koran population, and compare the acceptance rate using previously reported data in American population.

Materials And Methods: The translaminar lengths, thickness, heights, and sagittal-diagonal measurements were performed. The feasibility analysis was performed using unilateral and bilateral 3.5 mm cervical screw placement on the CT scans within 0.5 mm of safety margin. We also performed radiographic analysis of the morphometric dimensions and the feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar screw placement at C3-C7.

Results: Korean population had similar or significantly shorter translaminar lengths and thickness (lengths and thickness in C7 among males; lengths in C6-C7 and thickness in C4 among females) than American population, but had similar or significantly longer translaminar heights and sagittal-diagonal measurements (heights in C3-C7 and sagittal-diagonal measurements in C3-C6 among males; heights in C7 and sagittal-diagonal measurements in C3-C7 among females). Unilaterally, translaminar screw acceptance rates in C3-C7 were similar between Korean and American male population, but the rates in C4-C6 were significantly smaller between Korean and American female population. Bilaterally, translaminar screw acceptance rates in C3 and C5-C6 were significantly larger between Korean and American male population, but the rates in C3-C7 were similar between Korean and American female population.

Conclusion: The feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar screw placement is different depending on different ethnics. Subaxial cervical unilateral translaminar screw placement among Korean male population and bilateral placement at C4-C7 among Korean female population are more acceptable than American population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276750PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.159DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

translaminar screw
28
screw placement
24
unilateral bilateral
16
sagittal-diagonal measurements
16
korean american
16
feasibility unilateral
12
bilateral translaminar
12
lengths thickness
12
heights sagittal-diagonal
12
male population
12

Similar Publications

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of utilizing C1 posterior arch screws (PAS) combined with C2 translaminar screws as an adjunct for reinforcing upper cervical spine fixation.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on four male patients who underwent surgery involving C1 PASs and C2 translaminar screws between January 2022 and February 2024. Surgical technique involved the insertion of standard C1 lateral mass screws (LMS) and C2 pedicle screws, followed by the placement of C1 PASs and C2 translaminar screws for additional fixation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The atlantoaxial vertebral model was established in order to compare the biomechanical properties of C2 pedicle and translaminar screws from the perspective of the screws themselves.

Methods: A finite element model of the screw-vertebrae was developed. The screw load-displacement ratios were analysed under up/down and left/right load conditions; the vertebral load-displacement ratios under flexion/posterior extension (FLX/EXT), left/right lateral bending (LLB/RLB), and left/right rotation (LAR/RAR) load conditions; the bone-screw interface stress values and screw load-displacement ratios under physiological load conditions; and the structural stress values of the screw-rod structure under front/back and left/right load conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

Objective: To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF.

Summary Of Background Data: Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Upper cervical spine instrumentation is risky due to the anatomical complexities, including the proximity of critical structures like vertebral arteries and nerve roots, making precise surgery difficult.
  • Recent advancements in 3D imaging and computer-assisted navigation (CAN) are improving the accuracy of screw placement and reducing surgical risks, though these techniques have been less commonly applied in cervical spine surgeries compared to lumbar and thoracic procedures.
  • This manuscript provides a detailed technique using CAN for upper cervical instrumentation, specifically for various screw placements in patients with different cervical pathologies, demonstrating the importance of tailored approaches based on individual anatomical variations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The incidence of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine has increased in recent years. Unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation offers the advantages of less trauma, better stability, and fewer complications. However, the surgical difficulty and suboptimal pinning accuracy of translaminar facet screw placement in clinical practice limit its use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!