The purpose of this study was to examine the role of binocular vision during a prehension task performed in a visually enriched environment where the target object was surrounded by distractors/obstacles. Fifteen adults reached and grasped for a cylindrical peg while eye movements and upper limb kinematics were recorded. The complexity of the visual environment was manipulated by varying the number of distractors and by varying the saliency of the target. Gaze behavior (i.e., the latency of the primary gaze shift and frequency of gaze shifts prior to reach initiation) was comparable between viewing conditions. In contrast, a binocular advantage was evident in performance accuracy. Specifically, participants picked up the wrong object twice as often during monocular viewing when the complexity of the environment increased. Reach performance was more efficient during binocular viewing, which was demonstrated by shorter reach reaction time and overall movement time. Reaching movements during the approach phase had higher peak velocity during binocular viewing. During monocular viewing reach trajectories exhibited a direction bias during the acceleration phase, which was leftward during left eye viewing and rightward during right eye viewing. This bias can be explained by the presence of esophoria in the covered eye. The grasping interval was also extended by ~20% during monocular viewing; however, the duration of the return phase after the target was picked up was comparable across viewing conditions. In conclusion, binocular vision provides important input for planning and execution of prehension movements in visually enriched environments. Binocular advantage was evident, regardless of set size or target saliency, indicating that adults plan their movements more cautiously during monocular viewing, even in relatively simple environments with a highly salient target. Nevertheless, in visually-normal adults monocular input provides sufficient information to engage in online control to correct the initial errors in movement planning.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246685 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00959 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
January 2025
Division of Experimental and Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr- University, Bochum, Germany.
The dominance of one hemisphere for cognitive operations and decision making may be an efficient mechanism solving interhemispheric conflicts. To understand the ecological significance of the so-called metacontrol, we need better knowledge of its frequency and ontogenetic foundations. Since in pigeons, embryonic light experiences influence degree and direction of interhemispheric specialization and communication, it is conceivable that light affects metacontrol mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland.
Our visual system enables us to effortlessly navigate and recognize real-world visual environments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest a network of scene-responsive cortical visual areas, but much less is known about the temporal order in which different scene properties are analysed by the human visual system. In this study, we selected a set of 36 full-colour natural scenes that varied in spatial structure and semantic content that our male and female human participants viewed both in 2D and 3D while we recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBehav Res Methods
January 2025
CIMeC, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, The University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Sighting dominance is an important behavioral property which has been difficult to measure quantitatively with high precision. We developed a measurement method that is grounded in a two-camera model that satisfies these aims. Using a simple alignment task, this method quantifies sighting ocular dominance during binocular viewing, identifying each eye's relative contribution to binocular vision.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
December 2024
Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
During locomotion, the visual system can factor out the motion component caused by observer locomotion from the complex target flow vector to obtain the world-relative target motion. This process, which has been termed flow parsing, is known to be incomplete, but viewing with both eyes could potentially aid in this task. Binocular disparity and binocular summation could both improve performance when viewing with both eyes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransl Vis Sci Technol
December 2024
Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Purpose: We evaluated through-focus visual performance and accommodative response in young subjects through three segmented multifocal designs for myopia control, mapped on the spatial light modulator of a monocular adaptive optics visual simulator (AOVS), and compared with single vision (SV).
Methods: The segmented multifocal patterns included a 4 mm diameter center distance zone and offset peripheral defocus (MP1), astigmatism and coma (MP2), or a combination (MP3). High-contrast logMAR visual acuity (VA) was measured with monochromatic stimuli (555 nm).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!