Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To evaluate the use of topical cyclosporine A (CSA) 1% in the treatment of chronic follicular conjunctivitis (CFC).
Methods: Retrospective chart review from 2001 to 2012 identified 12 patients (22 eyes) with CFC (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 50.2 ± 15.4 years; 75% female; 92% white) treated with CSA. Main outcome measures included inflammation grade, visual acuity, concurrent corticosteroid (CS) therapy, effect on CS taper, and adverse effects.
Results: Mean ± SD follow-up time was 11.7 ± 9.7 months. Mean ± SD time from diagnosis to CSA treatment initiation was 2.4 ± 3.2 months. Mean ± SD duration of CSA treatment was 5.8 ± 2.8 months. Four patients (33%) complained of irritation (n = 2), redness (n = 1), itching (n = 1), and burning (n = 1) but none discontinued treatment. Concurrent CSs were tapered off in all patients after a mean ± SD of 5.0 ± 2.5 weeks. Mean ± SD initial vision was 0.078 ± 0.093 logMAR, whereas vision at final examination was 0.056 ± 0.081 logMAR (P = 0.02). Mean ± SD initial inflammation grade of 1.9 ± 1.0 was significantly reduced to final grade of 0.7 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0002). Mean ± SD time to initial inflammation control in 9 patients (75%) was 33.2 ± 24.5 days. Two patients (17%) switched to oral CSA because of lack of inflammation control.
Conclusions: Topical CSA 1% is an effective and well-tolerated therapy that decreased chronic inflammation and tapered topical CS in patients with CFC. The use of CSA in such patients warrants further investigation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000099 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!