Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Strategic Health Resources, La Canada, California. Electronic address:

Published: August 2015

A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to examine the risks and benefits of laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation compared with hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure Permanent Birth Control System (Bayer HealthCare AG, Whippany, NJ). Existing evidence shows that both LBTL and Essure are safe and effective methods of female sterilization. Both have high rates of efficacy and low rates of complications although when complications do occur, those related to the Essure procedure are more likely to be minor in nature. The analysis was limited by the restricted number of studies involving head-to-head comparisons of the 2 approaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hysteroscopic sterilization
8
laparoscopic bilateral
8
bilateral tubal
8
tubal ligation
8
comparative effectiveness
8
essure
4
essure hysteroscopic
4
sterilization versus
4
versus interval
4
interval laparoscopic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!