Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is a well-established treatment for heart failure and standard superior implantation has a high success rate with acceptable risk profile. When the superior approach is not feasible, surgical epicardial leads are considered. We present a case of transfemoral CRT as a viable alternative to surgical systems and discuss implant factors including lead choice and deep vein thrombosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu340 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!