Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of selected synthetic cathinones and two piperazines in oral fluid. Cross reactivity study with an on-site immunoassay device.

J Chromatogr A

Servicio de Toxicología Forense, Instituto de Ciencias Forenses, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: December 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • Several new synthetic cathinones and piperazines have emerged in the drug market, often evading traditional toxicology tests used for illegal stimulants.
  • A validated LC-MS/MS method was developed to detect specific synthetic drugs in oral fluid, showcasing efficient sample extraction and chromatographic separation within 10 minutes.
  • The method demonstrated strong validation results across various metrics, including limits of detection, accuracy, and assessment of cross-reactivity with a drug testing device, revealing that certain synthetic drugs could yield false positives for methamphetamine.

Article Abstract

Since the past few years, several synthetic cathinones and piperazines have been introduced into the drug market to substitute illegal stimulant drugs such as amphetamine and derivatives or cocaine due to their unregulated situation. These emerging drugs are not usually included in routine toxicological analysis. We developed and validated a LC-MS/MS method for the determination of methedrone, methylone, mephedrone, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), fluoromethcathinone, fluoromethamphetamine, 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP) and 3-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) in oral fluid. Sample extraction was performed using Strata X cartridges. Chromatographic separation was achieved in 10min using an Atlantis(®) T3 column (100mm×2.1mm, 3μm), and formic acid 0.1% and acetonitrile as mobile phase. The method was satisfactorily validated, including selectivity, linearity (0.2-0.5 to 200ng/mL), limits of detection (0.025-0.1ng/mL) and quantification (0.2-0.5ng/mL), imprecision and accuracy in neat oral fluid (%CV=0.0-12.7% and 84.8-103.6% of target concentration, respectively) and in oral fluid mixed with Quantisal™ buffer (%CV=7.2-10.3% and 80.2-106.5% of target concentration, respectively), matrix effect in neat oral fluid (-11.6 to 399.7%) and in oral fluid with Quantisal™ buffer (-69.9 to 131.2%), extraction recovery (87.9-134.3%) and recovery from the Quantisal™ (79.6-107.7%), dilution integrity (75-99% of target concentration) and stability at different conditions (-14.8 to 30.8% loss). In addition, cross reactivity produced by the studied synthetic cathinones in oral fluid using the Dräger DrugTest 5000 was assessed. All the analytes produced a methamphetamine positive result at high concentrations (100 or 10μg/mL), and fluoromethamphetamine also at low concentration (0.075μg/mL).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral fluid
28
synthetic cathinones
12
target concentration
12
cathinones piperazines
8
cross reactivity
8
neat oral
8
quantisal™ buffer
8
oral
7
fluid
7
liquid chromatography
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!