A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Auditory brainstem implantation in a 16-month-old boy with cochlear hypoplasia. | LitMetric

Auditory brainstem implantation in a 16-month-old boy with cochlear hypoplasia.

Otol Neurotol

*Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; †Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School; ‡Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; §Departments of Pediatric Neurosurgery and ∥Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital; and ¶Department of Surgery (Neurosurgery), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Published: April 2015

Objective: To determine the safety and feasibility of auditory brainstem implantation in children younger than 5 years.

Patient(s): Patients younger than 5 years who were not candidates for cochlear implantation because of anatomic considerations were included in the analyses.

Intervention(s): Auditory brainstem implantation via retrosigmoid craniotomy.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Audiologic, speech, quality of life, and safety outcomes were assessed.

Results: Auditory brainstem implantation was performed in a 16-month-old male infant with bilateral cochlear hypoplasia and cochlear nerve hypoplasia after a prior aborted attempt at cochlear implantation. Intraoperatively, multiphasic evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) characteristic of synchronized responses of central auditory pathways were obtained on multiple electrodes. There were no complications in the immediate postoperative period, and the child was discharged home on Postoperative Day 4. Audiologic testing 2 and 4 months after activation indicated sound detection between 45 and 70 dB HL for warble tones, improvements in Infant Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale scores, and subjective gains in sound awareness, as well as quality of life measures. There were no major or minor complications of the procedure.

Conclusion: Based on our experience in combination with the work of others internationally, auditory brainstem implantation is feasible and safe in children younger than 5 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000676DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auditory brainstem
24
brainstem implantation
20
auditory
8
cochlear hypoplasia
8
children younger
8
younger years
8
cochlear implantation
8
quality life
8
implantation
7
cochlear
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!