Impact of vitamin D replacement in patients with normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism and coexisting vitamin D deficiency.

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is increasingly recognized in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism but some clinicians are reluctant to replace vitamin D due to concerns with aggravating hypercalcaemia. We investigated the impact of vitamin D repletion in asymptomatic patients with normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 111 patients with elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations (>6.4 pmol/L) referred to our endocrine clinic between January and December 2012; we identified 39 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency, i.e. 25 hydroxy vitamin D <20 µg/L. Patients were categorized into normocalcaemic (n = 23) and hypercalcaemic (n = 16) groups and the impact on biochemical parameters was recorded after at least six months treatment with either 1600 or 3200 units daily of cholecalciferol.

Results: Both normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic groups showed a rise in 25 hydroxy vitamin D concentrations after replacement (p <0.0001). Parathyroid hormone concentrations fell in the normocalcaemic group (p = 0.08) but individually, five patients showed a rise (8-38% of baseline). In the hypercalcaemic group, parathyroid hormone remained static but the adjusted calcium concentration fell significantly (p = 0.006) except in two patients who showed mild rises (3 and 6%, respectively). There was no deterioration in renal function or calcium-related adverse events in any of the groups.

Conclusions: Our study supports the safety of vitamin D replacement in patients with mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism and coexistent vitamin D deficiency. Repletion does not aggravate hypercalcaemia and may limit disease progression. Patients with normocalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism need further characterization from longitudinal studies.