Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations on the erythropoietin effect and adverse events of darbepoetin.

Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol

University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Department Innere 1, Nephrology , Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, D-89070 Ulm , Germany +49 731 500 44561 ; +49 731 500 44567 ;

Published: January 2015

Introduction: In the TREAT and RED-HF trials, patients who received a high darbepoetin dose had an increased risk of adverse events. To find an explanation, the published literature was analyzed on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of darbepoetin.

Areas Covered: Based on the sigmoid Emax model, the concentration producing 50% of the maximum erythropoietin effect is reported as CE50 = 0.41 ng/ml and the Hill coefficient as H = 3.0 for darbepoetin. Accordingly, a pharmacodynamics-based threshold concentration can be estimated with CE05 = 0.153 ng/ml producing 5% of Emax and a ceiling concentration with CE95 = 1.098 ng/ml producing 95% of Emax, respectively.

Expert Opinion: Darbepoetin trough levels should not be less than the threshold concentration but peak levels above the ceiling concentration could be associated with an increased risk of adverse events. The time span associated with the concentration fluctuation between the ceiling and the threshold concentration is estimated with 236 h (= 2.84 times elimination half-life of 83 h) and shorter than the 336 h when dosing every other week. According to such time-dependent pharmacodynamics, a weekly dosing regimen might be more effective and associated with less adverse events than higher doses every other week in patients with suboptimal response to a normal darbepoetin dose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2015.989832DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse events
16
threshold concentration
12
darbepoetin dose
8
increased risk
8
risk adverse
8
concentration estimated
8
ng/ml producing
8
ceiling concentration
8
concentration
7
darbepoetin
5

Similar Publications

Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of adverse events (AEs) associated with factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in pediatric patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register for English-language records from the establishment of the database up to October 17, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This prospective, single-arm pharmacodynamic study assessed the effect of colchicine (COLC) [Strides Pharma UK Ltd, Watford, Hertfordshire, England] 0.5 mg administered orally once daily for 14 days on platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin reaction units (ARUs) and P2Y reaction units (PRUs).

Methods: Twenty-two patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with daily maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel were recruited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults.

Drugs Aging

January 2025

Program for the Care and Study of the Aging Heart, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th St, New York, NY, LH-36510063, USA.

There are several pharmacologic agents that have been touted as guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it is important to recognize that older adults with HFpEF also contend with an increased risk for adverse effects from medications due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications, as well as the concurrence of geriatric conditions such as polypharmacy and frailty. With this review, we discuss the underlying evidence for the benefits of various treatments in HFpEF and incorporate key considerations for older adults, a subpopulation that may be at higher risk for adverse drug events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The rapid development and deployment of mRNA and non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have played a pivotal role in mitigating the global pandemic. Despite their success in reducing severe disease outcomes, emerging concerns about cardiovascular complications have raised questions regarding their safety. This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence on the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 vaccines, assessing both their protective and adverse impacts, while considering the challenges posed by the limited availability of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on these rare adverse events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are commonly prescribed to provide protein and energy to hemodialysis (HD) patients. There is a debate about the appropriate timing to administer ONS. We aimed to study the effect of different timings of ONS on variable outcomes in HD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!