Background: The elderly (≥75years) constitute a high-risk subset of patients who continue to have a poorer prognosis than non-elderly (<75years). Whether the effects of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are independent of age has not been reported. We investigated the outcomes following primary PCI (PPCI) with bare-metal stent (BMS) or EES in elderly vs. non-elderly STEMI patients.
Methods: The EXAMINATION trial randomized 1498 STEMI patients to BMS or EES. The primary patient-oriented endpoint (POCE) was the combined of all-cause death, any-recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and any-revascularization at 1-year. The secondary endpoint included the device-oriented combined (DOCE) of cardiac death, target-vessel MI and target-lesion revascularization. These endpoints and their components were compared between elderly and non-elderly.
Results: Among patients enrolled in the trial, 245 (16.3%) were elderly, allocated to BMS (n=132) or EES (n=113), while the remaining 1253 (83.7%) were non-elderly, allocated to BMS (n=615) or EES (n=638). At 1-year, both the POCE and DOCE were observed more frequently in elderly vs. non-elderly group (24.5% vs. 10.5%, p<0.001 and 15.9% vs. 5.1%, p<0.001). Whereas in non-elderly, both POCE and DOCE were lower in EES vs. BMS (12.4% vs. 8.8%, p=0.03 and 6.7% vs. 3.6%, p=0.01), no differences were found in elderly, with a tendency for interaction between age and stent type for POCE (p=0.05). On multivariate analysis age ≥75 years was an independent predictor of POCE (HR 2.19 [95%CI 1.59-3.01], p<0.0001) and DOCE (HR 2.42 [95%CI 1.60-3.7], p<0.001) at 1-year.
Conclusions: In STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, advanced age (≥75 years) is associated with worse outcomes. The beneficial effects of EES over BMS tended to be age-dependent.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.038 | DOI Listing |
Int J Cardiol
February 2025
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. Electronic address:
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
November 2024
Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Background: Long-term clinical data on biodegradable-polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the BP-DES SYNERGY compared to XIENCE V, a durable-polymer (DP)-DES.
Methods: We compared patients treated with BP-DES or DP-DES at our center from 2008 to 2020.
Cardiol Young
October 2024
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Background: Adult Kawasaki patients may require intervention for occlusive coronary artery disease. Some adverse effects of first-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with sirolimus have been reported in this population.
Methods: A total of nine lesions in eight (seven males, one female) patients who underwent stent implantations in this population between 2000 and 2021 were reviewed.
Trials
October 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Pharmacoecon Open
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Background And Objective: Evidence on health economic outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) comparing different contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) with each other is scarce, as most previous randomised DES trials did not assess such aspects. This prespecified health economic evaluation of the Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population (BIO-RESORT) trial aimed to compare at 3-year follow-up both health effects and costs of PCI with one of three new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.
Methods: The randomised BIO-RESORT trial assessed in 3514 patients the ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and very-thin-strut Synergy everolimus-eluting (EES) stent versus the thin-strut durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!