Unlabelled: In addition to headache, persons with chronic migraine (CM) experience multiple symptoms, both ictal and interictal, that may contribute to their suffering. Translating clinical trial results into practice requires assessment of the results' clinical meaningfulness. When examining treatment benefit in this disabled patient population, multiple headache-symptom measures should be considered to fully reflect clinical relevance. Currently, only onabotulinumtoxinA is approved specifically for headache prophylaxis in adults with CM. Topiramate is the only other therapeutic agent with double-blind, placebo-controlled evidence in this population. Herein we evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate as headache prophylaxis in CM by comparing primary endpoints from the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical program and the topiramate clinical trial (frequency of headache days [primary endpoint in PREEMPT; secondary in topiramate trial] and migraine/migrainous days [primary in topiramate trial, or "migraine/probable-migraine days"; secondary in PREEMPT]). Additionally, outcome measures such as responder rates, health-related quality of life, discontinuation rates, safety, and tolerability profiles are important clinical considerations. The clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate. These data support these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in adults with CM.
Perspective: CM is a chronic pain condition. We sought to determine the clinical relevance of recent trials in this disabled population. Clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate, and support use of these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in CM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.004 | DOI Listing |
J Headache Pain
December 2024
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Combination treatments for migraine prophylaxis present a promising approach to addressing the diverse and complex mechanisms underlying migraine. This review explores the potential of combining oral conventional prophylactics, onabotulinumtoxin A, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, and small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants). Among the most promising strategies, dual CGRP inhibition through mAbs and gepants may enhance efficacy by targeting both the CGRP peptide and its receptor, while the combination of onabotulinumtoxin A with CGRP treatments offers synergistic pain relief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Neurol Sci
November 2024
Ottawa Hospital, Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Objective: We have updated the migraine prevention guideline of the Canadian Headache Society from 2012, as there are new therapies available, and additionally, we have provided guidelines for the prevention of chronic migraine, which was not addressed in the previous iteration.
Methods: We undertook a systematic review to identify new studies since the last guideline. For studies identified, we performed data extraction and subsequent meta-analyses where possible.
Front Neurol
September 2024
Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Health Technol Assess
October 2024
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Headache
October 2024
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Objective: To develop machine learning models using patient and migraine features that can predict treatment responses to commonly used migraine preventive medications.
Background: Currently, there is no accurate way to predict response to migraine preventive medications, and the standard trial-and-error approach is inefficient.
Methods: In this cohort study, we analyzed data from the Mayo Clinic Headache database prospectively collected from 2001 to December 2023.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!